Impact of Obstetric History on Preterm Birth: An Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India
- PMID: 41246660
- PMCID: PMC12616214
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.94558
Impact of Obstetric History on Preterm Birth: An Observational Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India
Abstract
Background Preterm birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Obstetric history factors such as prior preterm birth, miscarriages, stillbirths, neonatal deaths, and short interpregnancy intervals have been identified as important predictors, but data from North India remain limited. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the association between adverse obstetric history and risk of preterm birth in women delivering at a tertiary care hospital in Lucknow, India. Methods This observational study included 200 women aged 18-40 years with singleton live births: 100 preterm (<37 weeks) and 100 term (≥37 weeks). Data on gravidity, parity, abortions, interpregnancy interval, and prior adverse outcomes were collected using a structured proforma. Statistical analysis included chi-squared tests, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Results Mean gestational age and birth weight were significantly lower in the preterm group (32.6±2.1 weeks; 1840±510 g) compared with the term group (38.2±1.1 weeks; 2630±520 g; p<0.001). Independent predictors of preterm birth included prior preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 6.41; 95% CI: 2.61-15.72), neonatal death (aOR: 4.66), stillbirth (aOR: 3.87), recurrent abortions (aOR: 3.08), short interpregnancy interval <18 months (aOR: 3.04), and higher gravidity ≥3 (aOR: 2.19). The risk increased cumulatively with multiple adverse factors (aOR: 12.98 for ≥2 risk factors). Model performance was strong (Hosmer-Lemeshow: p=0.57; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.80). Conclusion Adverse obstetric history is a significant predictor of preterm birth. Systematic documentation of prior obstetric events and targeted antenatal surveillance can help identify high-risk pregnancies and reduce preterm birth burden in resource-limited settings.
Keywords: india; interpregnancy interval; neonatal death; obstetric history; preterm birth; recurrent pregnancy loss; stillbirth.
Copyright © 2025, Baig et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee of King George's Medical University issued approval 16/Ethics/2024. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
-
- New global estimates on preterm birth published. [ Aug; 2025 ]. 2018. https://www.who.int/news/item/17-11-2018-new-global-estimates-on-preterm... https://www.who.int/news/item/17-11-2018-new-global-estimates-on-preterm...
-
- National Family Health Survey - 5: 2019-21. IIPS; Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS); 2021. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India Fact Sheet [Internet] pp. 2021–2025.
-
- National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, et al. Lancet. 2012;379:2162–2172. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources