A phase 4, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of rimegepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults with a history of inadequate response to traditional oral preventive medications
- PMID: 41255098
- DOI: 10.1177/03331024251391378
A phase 4, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of rimegepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults with a history of inadequate response to traditional oral preventive medications
Abstract
AimThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of rimegepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in participants with a documented history of inadequate response to 2-4 categories of traditional oral preventive medication (OPM).MethodsThis multinational phase 4 trial consisted of an untreated 28-day observational phase (OP) and a 12-week double-blind treatment (DBT) phase. Participants with 4-14 monthly migraine days (MMDs), <15 monthly headache days (<7 non-migraine) and documented previous inadequate response to 2-4 traditional OPM categories were enrolled. Participants were randomized to rimegepant 75 mg orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) or placebo every other day (EOD). The primary endpoint was mean change from the OP in MMDs through the 12-week DBT phase. Key secondary endpoints were tested hierarchically to control type I errors. Tolerance and safety were assessed throughout the DBT phase.ResultsIn total, 328 participants received rimegepant and 324 received placebo. The most common OPM categories with prior inadequate response were anticonvulsants (61%), beta-blockers (56%) and amitriptyline (51%). The mean ± SD number of MMDs in the OP was 8.4 ± 2.4 and 8.3 ± 2.3, respectively, in the rimegepant (n = 324) and placebo (n = 319) groups. Across the DBT phase, participants who received rimegepant had a significantly larger mean change from the OP in MMDs than those who received placebo (-2.1 vs. -0.5 days; difference = -1.6 days; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -2.1 to -1.2; p < 0.0001). All key secondary endpoints favored rimegepant: (i) percentage of participants with ≥50% reduction from the OP in MMDs with moderate or severe pain intensity across the DBT phase (difference: 20.1%; 95% CI = 13.7 to 26.5; p < 0.0001); (ii) mean change from the OP in MMDs in the first month of the DBT phase (difference: -1.7 days; 95% CI = -2.3 to -1.2; p < 0.0001); (iii) mean change from the OP in MMDs in the last month of the DBT phase (difference: -1.4 days; 95% CI = -2.1 to -0.8; p < 0.0001); (iv) mean change from baseline in Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire v2.1 Restrictive Role Function domain score at week 12 of the DBT phase (difference: 6.6 points; 95% CI = 3.6 to 9.5; p < 0.0001); and (v) mean change from baseline in Migraine Interictal Burden Scale score at week 12 of the DBT phase (difference: -0.9 points; 95% CI = -1.4 to -0.4; p = 0.0006). Rimegepant was well tolerated with a safety profile not notably different from placebo.ConclusionsRimegepant 75 mg ODT EOD is efficacious and well tolerated for the prevention of episodic migraine in participants with a documented history of inadequate response to 2-4 categories of traditional OPM.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05518123 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05518123).
Keywords: calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist; headache; migraine; pain; preventive treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: Patricia Pozo-Rosich has received, in the last three years, honoraria as a consultant and speaker from AbbVie, Almirall, Dr Reddy's, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Medscape, Novartis, Organon, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer and Teva Pharmaceuticals. Her research group has received research grants from AbbVie, AGAUR, EraNet Neuron, FEDER RIS3CAT, Instituto Investigación Carlos III, MICINN, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceuticals, and has received funding for clinical trials from AbbVie, Amgen, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Pfizer and Teva. She is an associate editor for the journals
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
