Convolutional neural networks for automatic tuber segmentation and quantification of tuber burden in tuberous sclerosis complex
- PMID: 41258699
- DOI: 10.1111/epi.70007
Convolutional neural networks for automatic tuber segmentation and quantification of tuber burden in tuberous sclerosis complex
Abstract
Objective: This study was undertaken to develop a fully automated algorithm for tuber segmentation and quantification of tuber volume that performs similarly to the gold standard human neuroradiologist.
Methods: We used brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) to train and validate a convolutional neural network (CNN), which was evaluated on segmentation with the Dice-Sørensen similarity coefficient (DSSC) and on tuber burden quantification with Spearman correlation coefficient against a neuroradiologist's gold standard in the test set.
Results: We collected 263 MRIs from 196 patients (57% males) with median (25th percentile-75th percentile) age of 4.3 (3.0-10.1) years: 176 MRIs in the train set, 39 in the validation set, and 48 in the test set. The final model achieved in the test set a DSSC of .820 (95% confidence interval [CI] = .799-.840) in the whole brain and in the different lobes the following: .831 (95% CI = .804-.850) in left frontal, .827 (95% CI = .799-.853) in right frontal, .817 (95% CI = .779-.842) in left temporal, .834 (95% CI = .812-.849) in right temporal, .821 (95% CI = .783-.856) in left parietal, .840 (95% CI = .810-.865) in right parietal, .832 (95% CI = .808-.851) in left occipital, and .856 (95% CI = .838-.871) in right occipital. CNN tuber volume quantification nearly perfectly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient) with the neuroradiologist's across the whole brain (.984, 95% CI = .971-.991) and in the different lobes: .966 (95% CI = .940-.981) in left frontal, .973 (95% CI = .952-.985) in right frontal, .936 (95% CI = .888-.964) in left temporal, .967 (95% CI = .942-.982) in right temporal, .989 (95% CI = .980-.994) in left parietal, .983 (95% CI = .970-.990) in right parietal, .992 (95% CI = .985-.995) in left occipital, and .982 (95% CI = .968-.990) in right occipital (all p < .00001).
Significance: We generated, trained, validated, and made publicly available a CNN that achieves a near-perfect correlation with a neuroradiologist gold standard quantification of tuber burden, allows for objective tuber segmentation, and increases rigor and reproducibility in TSC research across institutions.
Keywords: convolutional neural network; deep learning; neuroradiology; tuber burden; tuberous sclerosis complex.
© 2025 International League Against Epilepsy.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Northrup H, Aronow ME, Bebin EM, Bissler J, Darling TN, de Vries PJ, et al. Updated international tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria and surveillance and management recommendations. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;123:50–66.
-
- Crino PB, Nathanson KL, Henske EP. The tuberous sclerosis complex. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1345–1356.
-
- O'Callaghan FJ, Shiell AW, Osborne JP, Martyn CN. Prevalence of tuberous sclerosis estimated by capture‐recapture analysis. Lancet. 1998;351:1490.
-
- Osborne JP, Fryer A, Webb D. Epidemiology of tuberous sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;615:125–127.
-
- Sampson JR, Scahill SJ, Stephenson JB, Mann L, Connor JM. Genetic aspects of tuberous sclerosis in the west of Scotland. J Med Genet. 1989;26:28–31.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
