Neurodevelopmental effects of genetic frontotemporal dementia mutations revealed by total intracranial volume differences
- PMID: 41259271
- PMCID: PMC12722584
- DOI: 10.1177/13872877251393414
Neurodevelopmental effects of genetic frontotemporal dementia mutations revealed by total intracranial volume differences
Abstract
BackgroundConverging evidence hints at neurodevelopmental effects in people at risk of genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD).ObjectiveWe investigated total intracranial volume (TIV), a neuroimaging marker of neurodevelopment, and years of education differences between adult mutation carriers and familial non-mutation carriers, as measures of the structural and functional neurodevelopmental effects of FTD-causing genetic mutations.MethodsThis cross-sectional cohort study, facilitated through the FTD Prevention Initiative (FPI), included 902 adult pathogenic mutation carriers of GRN, MAPT, or C9orf72, and 532 familial non-carriers. ANCOVAs were computed to compare TIV and education between groups per gene. Pearson's correlations were used to examine associations between TIV and education.ResultsMutation carriers (mean ± SD age = 50.0 ± 13.2 years, sex = 55% female, n(GRN) = 298, n(MAPT) = 187, n(C9orf72) = 417) were compared to familial non-carriers (age = 48.0 ± 12.9 years, sex = 58% female, n(GRN) = 201, n(MAPT) = 114), n(C9orf72) = 217). Consistent with prior findings in young adults, GRN carriers showed larger TIV, on average by 20531 mm3, compared to familial non-carriers (95% CI [85.4, 40977], p = 0.049, η2p = 0.008). Larger TIV correlated with higher years of education in GRN carriers (95% CI [0.01, 0.24], r(295) = 0.12, p = 0.03) and GRN non-carriers (95% CI [0.08, 0.34], r(198) = 0.21, p = 0.002). MAPT carriers demonstrated smaller TIV than non-carriers, on average by 29896 mm3 (95% CI [-58248, -1545], p = 0.039, η2p = 0.02). Models with C9orf72 and education as outcome variables did not reveal significant differences.ConclusionsIn support of the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of FTD, GRN and MAPT mutations are linked to structural neurodevelopmental changes in TIV. Further research is needed to identify mechanisms underlying neurodevelopmental influences of FTD mutations and ascertain their suitability as intervention targets.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; development; familial dementia; frontotemporal dementia; magnetic resonance imaging.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J.D.R. has received consulting fees from UCB, AC Immune, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Takeda, and Eisai and is part of the Medical Advisory Board for Alector, Arkuda Therapeutics, Wave Life Sciences, and Prevail Therapeutics. R.S-V. has received consulting fees from Wave Pharmaceuticals and Ionis-Biogen and from Roche Diagnostics and Janssen for educational activities and is member of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Wave Pharmaceuticals and Ionis-Biogen. B.B. has received consulting fees from Alector and Wave Pharmaceuticals and has a pending patent on noninvasive brain stimulation. M.M. has received compensation for royalties from Henry Stewart Talks Ltd; consulting fees from Arkuda Therapeutics, Ionis, Alector, Biogen, and Wave Life Sciences; personal fees for educational activities from Alector and Arkuda Therapeutics; and travel fees from Alector Pharmaceuticals. M.C.T. has received consulting fees from Roche. C.G. has received consulting fees from Studentlitteratur 238 SEK 2020 and reimbursement for travel and lodging from University of Pennsylvania for attending KOL-meeting in October 2019. J.R. has received consulting fees from Alector, Asceneuron, Astronautx, Astex, Aviado Bio, Booster Therapeutics, ClinicalInk, Curasen Therapeutics, Cumulus Neuro, Eisai, Ferrer, SV Health, Prevail, Vesper Bio and UCB; he has provided expert testimony in private noncommercial medicolegal case reports; is part of an Advisory Board for several noncommercial academic institutions; and is Chief Scientific Advisor to Alzheimers Research UK, Guarantor of Brain, Trustee PSP Association, Trustee Darwin College, and Associate Director of the Dementias Platform UK. R.V. has received consulting fees from CyTox and is a member of the Data Safety and Monitoring Board of AC Immune. I. Santana has received consulting fees from Biogen and Roche Biogen, personal fees for presentations from Biogen, and is part of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Novo Nordisk. S.D. has received consulting fees from Innodem Neurosciences and personal fees from Sunovion Eisai. J.L. has received consulting fees from Bayer Vital, Roche, and Biogen; is part of the Advisory Board for Axon Neurosciences; has received compensation for duty as part-time CMO from Modag; and has received author fees from Thieme medical publishers and W. Kohlhammer GmbH medical publishers as well as nonfinancial support from AbbVie. M.O. has received consulting fees from Biogen, Axon, and Roche and is part of the Advisory Board for Axon. I.L.B. has received consulting fees from Alector Prevail Therapeutics and personal fees from MDS and is also part of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Alector Prevail Therapeutics. K.K. served on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Takeda Global Research & Development Center and data monitoring boards of Pfizer and Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy and received research support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation and the NIH. B.F.B. has served as an investigator for clinical trials sponsored by Alector, Biogen, Transposon and Cognition Therapeutics; he serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Tau Consortium which is funded by the Rainwater Charitable Foundation. A.L.B. has served as a consultant for Aeovian, AGTC, Alector, Arkuda, Arvinas, Boehringer Ingelheim, Denali, GSK, Life Edit, Humana, Oligomerix, Oscotec, Roche, TrueBinding, Wave, Merck and received research support from Biogen, Eisai and Regeneron. H.J.R. has received research support from Biogen Pharmaceuticals, has consulting agreements with Wave Neuroscience, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Eisai Pharmaceuticals, and Genentech. E.F. has received consulting fees for the AAN annual meeting speaker and course director honorariums; is member of the Data Safety Monitoring Board for the Lithium trial, PI E. Huey (trial funded by peer reviewed grants from ADDF); and is a scientific advisory board member for Vigil Neuroscience, Denali Therapeutics, and on an advisory panel for Biogen. M. Synofzik has received consulting fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, and Orphazyme Pharmaceuticals and received support from the Movement Disorder Society for travel.
Figures
References
-
- Cruts M, Gijselinck I, Van Der Zee J, et al. Null mutations in progranulin cause ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17q21. Nature 2006; 442: 920–924. - PubMed
-
- Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, et al. Association of missense and 5′-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature 1998; 393: 702–705. - PubMed
-
- Yeh T-H, Liu H-F, Li Y-W, et al. C9orf72 is essential for neurodevelopment and motility mediated by cyclin G1. Exp Neurol 2018; 304: 114–124. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
