Dosage exploration of the effects of honey and its derivatives on cardiometabolic outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews and GRADE-assessed updated meta-analysis
- PMID: 41261111
- PMCID: PMC12630772
- DOI: 10.1038/s41387-025-00403-9
Dosage exploration of the effects of honey and its derivatives on cardiometabolic outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews and GRADE-assessed updated meta-analysis
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases and diabetes are associated with significant mortality, morbidity, and economic burden, highlighting the need for alternative preventive strategies. Honey bee products, including honey, royal jelly, and propolis, are considered potential interventions for managing cardiometabolic risk factors. This umbrella review aimed to compare the effectiveness of these products in cardiometabolic health. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception through 21ST October 2024 to identify eligible meta-analyses and primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Random-effect pairwise analysis combined trial findings, while dose-response and influence analyses assessed result robustness. Evidence quality and certainty were evaluated using AMSTAR-II, ROB, GRADE, and ICEMAN criteria. Analysis of 69 RCTs with 3544 participants revealed that 10 g of honey daily may lower Hemoglobin A1C but adversely affect systolic blood pressure, Aspartate transferase, triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, and high-sensitive C-reactive protein. Royal jelly improved blood pressure, lipid profiles, glycemic indices, and total antioxidant capacity. Propolis demonstrated reductions in anthropometric measures and improvements in lipid profile, glycemic control, liver enzymes, and inflammation and oxidative stress markers. While long-term or high-dose honey consumption in individuals with health concerns warrants caution, RJ and propolis demonstrated dose-dependent benefits for cardiometabolic health with proper certainty. Future research should focus on population-specific characteristics and optimized dosages.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the Ethics Committee of the Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS.REC.1404.036). The review followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and adhered to the PRIOR and PRISMA guidelines, as detailed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.
Figures
References
-
- WHO. Noncommunicable Diseases. 2024. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases.
-
- CDC. CfDCaP. Heart Disease Facts. 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/heart-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html.
-
- WHO. WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. 2019. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978924151536.
-
- Farhadnejad H, Saber N, Neshatbini Tehrani A, Kazemi Jahromi M, Mokhtari E, Norouzzadeh M, et al. Herbal products as complementary or alternative medicine for the management of hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: current evidence based on findings of interventional studies. J Nutr Metab. 2024;2024:8300428. 10.1155/2024/8300428. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
