Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 20;15(1):186.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01572-7.

Further analysis and refinements of the perceived stressors in intensive care units (PS-ICU) scale: a French nation-wide cross-sectional multicentre study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Further analysis and refinements of the perceived stressors in intensive care units (PS-ICU) scale: a French nation-wide cross-sectional multicentre study

Florent Lheureux et al. Ann Intensive Care. .

Abstract

Background: Assessing sources of job stress in intensive care units is a critical issue for preventing many occupational health and care-related issues, such as burnout, voluntary turnover and decrease in quality and safety of care. Accordingly, this French nation-wide multicentre study aims to provide supplementary evidence regarding the validity of a recent tool: the Perceived Stressors in Intensive Care Units (PS-ICU) scale. More precisely, this study has three main objectives: to 1) confirm the metrological properties of the PS-ICU scale on a large sample of professionals; 2) test its measurement invariance between nurses, physicians and residents (initial population targeted by the scale); 3) examine whether the scale would also be suited for use with nursing auxiliaries. In addition, depending on the results (which may suggest the removal of several items), this study offers the possibility to shorten the scale to facilitate its use.

Method and results: 2241 ICU professionals (1135 nurses, 308 physicians, 179 residents, and 619 nursing auxiliaries; overall participation rate of 58.10%) from 42 ICUs in France, voluntarily completed an online questionnaire collecting socio-demographic data and perceived job stressors (PS-ICU). Exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM), unidimensional reliability (McDonald's Omega) and item response theory (IRT) analyses overall confirmed the metrological properties of the scale, while several items were removed and the sixth factor ("lack of support and resources from the organisation") measured by the scale was revised. Results regarding measurement invariance show that the PS-ICU scale can be used to compare occupational groups, including nursing auxiliaries. Finally, all analyses resulted in a reduction of the scale to a 26-item version.

Conclusions: The PS-ICU scale, which measures generic and ICU-specific job stress factors, is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to collect data from nurses, physicians and residents, as well as from nursing auxiliaries. With 26 items, it can be used by researchers and managers in ICUs to assess the extent and type of stress factors perceived by healthcare professionals.

Keywords: Intensive care units; Invariance; Job stressors; Reliability; Scale; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study received approval from the ethical committee of the French Language Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française; reference CE SRLF 23-088). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Path diagram of the exploratory structural equation modelling for the shortened 26-item version of the PS-ICU scale for the whole sample (nurses, physicians, residents, and nursing auxiliaries; only loadings ≥ 0.30 are reported)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distributions observed for the full version of PS-ICU (50 items) and the two alternative shortened versions (26 items, and the same 26-item version plus the 5 items that best measured general stress)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of the data analysis strategy and results associated with the different aims

References

    1. Burghi G, Lambert J, Chaize M, Goinheix K, Quiroga C, Fariña G, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and consequences of severe burnout syndrome in ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(11):1785–6.[if gte mso 9]> Normal 0 21 false false false FR ZH-CN X-NONE 10.1007/s00134-014-3454-x - PubMed
    1. Moss M, Good VS, Gozal D, Kleinpell R, Sessler CN. An official critical care societies collaborative statement—burnout syndrome in critical care health-care professionals. Chest. 2016;150(1):17–26. 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.649 - PubMed
    1. Papazian L, Hraiech S, Loundou A, Herridge MS, Boyer L. High-level burnout in physicians and nurses working in adult ICUs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(4):387–400. 10.1007/s00134-023-07025-8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Terzi N, Fournier A, Lesieur O, Chappé J, Annane D, Chagnon JL, et al. Perceived quality of life in intensive care medicine physicians: a French National Survey. J Intensive Care Med. 2024;39(3):230–9. 10.1177/08850666231199937 - PubMed
    1. Ayed A, Abu Ejheisheh M, Aqtam I, Batran A, Farajallah M. The relationship between professional quality of life and work environment among nurses in intensive care units. INQUIRY. 2024. 10.1177/00469580241297974. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources