Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Nov 21.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01561-5. Online ahead of print.

The 'Values in Modelling' Framework for Patient and Public Involvement in Health Economics Modelling: Development and Application in the LEAP Model Project

Affiliations
Review

The 'Values in Modelling' Framework for Patient and Public Involvement in Health Economics Modelling: Development and Application in the LEAP Model Project

Stephanie Harvard et al. Pharmacoeconomics. .

Abstract

Patient and public involvement (PPI) in health economics modelling is increasingly recommended, yet formal guidance for how to structure or evaluate it remains limited. The Values in Modelling (VIM) framework was developed to address this gap by helping teams identify and deliberate on value-laden decisions in modelling. Drawing on philosophical theory, the framework defines five steps to guide collaboration between modellers and transdisciplinary participators and to document their influence on decision making: (1) identify ethical issues and perspectives; (2) characterize modelling decisions; (3) select decision-making strategies; (4) deliberate 'open' decisions; and (5) report and evaluate. We applied the VIM framework in the Lifetime Exposures and Asthma Outcomes Projection (LEAP) model project, which models the cost effectiveness of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters for asthma prevention and management. In this application, the framework helped prioritize modelling decisions for PPI, supported transparent deliberation about uncertainty, and led to concrete methodological changes-including new sensitivity analyses and revised outcome measures. These results demonstrate how a theory-informed process can enhance PPI in modelling, improving transparency, justification, and adequacy-for-purpose in health economics research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare. Author contributions: Stephanie Harvard: conceptualization, methodology, project administration, writing—original draft; Rachel Carter: methodology, writing—review and editing; Sian Hoe Cheong: methodology, writing—review and editing; Tony Lanier: methodology writing—review and editing; Zainab Zeyan: methodology, writing—review and editing; Amin Adibi: methodology, software, formal analysis, writing—review and editing; Spencer Lee: investigation, software, formal analysis, writing—review and editing; Cristina Novacovik: investigation, visualization, writing—review and editing; Mark Ewert: software, formal analysis, writing—review and editing; Eric B. Winsberg: conceptualization, writing—review and editing; Kate Johnson: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition.

References

    1. Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, De Bekker-Grob E, Briggs AH, Carswell C, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022;40:601–9. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bunka M, Ghanbarian S, Riches L, Landry G, Edwards L, Hoens AM, et al. Collaborating with patient partners to model clinical care pathways in major depressive disorder: the benefits of mixing evidence and lived experience. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022;40:971–7. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Gibbs NK, Angus C, Dixon S, Parry CD, Meier PS. Stakeholder engagement in the development of public health economic models: an application to modelling of minimum unit pricing of alcohol in South Africa. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):395-403.
    1. Staniszewska S, Hill EM, Grant R, Grove P, Porter J, Shiri T, et al. Developing a framework for public involvement in mathematical and economic modelling: bringing new dynamism to vaccination policy recommendations. Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Res. 2021;14:435–45. - DOI
    1. Xie RZ, Malik E, deFur MT, Linthicum MT, Bright JL. Putting stakeholder engagement at the center of health economic modeling for health technology assessment in the United States. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021;39:631–8. - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources