The 'Values in Modelling' Framework for Patient and Public Involvement in Health Economics Modelling: Development and Application in the LEAP Model Project
- PMID: 41269490
- DOI: 10.1007/s40273-025-01561-5
The 'Values in Modelling' Framework for Patient and Public Involvement in Health Economics Modelling: Development and Application in the LEAP Model Project
Abstract
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in health economics modelling is increasingly recommended, yet formal guidance for how to structure or evaluate it remains limited. The Values in Modelling (VIM) framework was developed to address this gap by helping teams identify and deliberate on value-laden decisions in modelling. Drawing on philosophical theory, the framework defines five steps to guide collaboration between modellers and transdisciplinary participators and to document their influence on decision making: (1) identify ethical issues and perspectives; (2) characterize modelling decisions; (3) select decision-making strategies; (4) deliberate 'open' decisions; and (5) report and evaluate. We applied the VIM framework in the Lifetime Exposures and Asthma Outcomes Projection (LEAP) model project, which models the cost effectiveness of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters for asthma prevention and management. In this application, the framework helped prioritize modelling decisions for PPI, supported transparent deliberation about uncertainty, and led to concrete methodological changes-including new sensitivity analyses and revised outcome measures. These results demonstrate how a theory-informed process can enhance PPI in modelling, improving transparency, justification, and adequacy-for-purpose in health economics research.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare. Author contributions: Stephanie Harvard: conceptualization, methodology, project administration, writing—original draft; Rachel Carter: methodology, writing—review and editing; Sian Hoe Cheong: methodology, writing—review and editing; Tony Lanier: methodology writing—review and editing; Zainab Zeyan: methodology, writing—review and editing; Amin Adibi: methodology, software, formal analysis, writing—review and editing; Spencer Lee: investigation, software, formal analysis, writing—review and editing; Cristina Novacovik: investigation, visualization, writing—review and editing; Mark Ewert: software, formal analysis, writing—review and editing; Eric B. Winsberg: conceptualization, writing—review and editing; Kate Johnson: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition.
References
-
- Gibbs NK, Angus C, Dixon S, Parry CD, Meier PS. Stakeholder engagement in the development of public health economic models: an application to modelling of minimum unit pricing of alcohol in South Africa. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):395-403.
-
- Staniszewska S, Hill EM, Grant R, Grove P, Porter J, Shiri T, et al. Developing a framework for public involvement in mathematical and economic modelling: bringing new dynamism to vaccination policy recommendations. Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Res. 2021;14:435–45. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
