Genetic analysis in fetuses with isolated clubfoot: diagnostic insights and added value
- PMID: 41272104
- DOI: 10.1038/s41431-025-01982-y
Genetic analysis in fetuses with isolated clubfoot: diagnostic insights and added value
Abstract
This study evaluates the diagnostic genetic yield in fetuses sonographically suspect of having isolated clubfoot. We conducted a retrospective study on all fetuses with apparently isolated clubfoot on initial ultrasound, examined between January 2021 and December 2024. Clubfoot was classified as isolated when no additional structural anomalies were observed on initial imaging. Among 218 cases, 140 (64%) were classified as isolated. Prenatal genetic testing was performed in 64 of these cases (46%), of which 61 (95%) underwent both copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis. In 38 of the 61 (62%) cases targeted investigation of the DMPK gene was carried out too. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic causative variants were identified in six of the 61 (9.8%) pregnancies: two of the 26 tested (7.7%) with unilateral clubfoot and four of the 35 tested (11.4%) with bilateral clubfoot. These include SNVs in TRPV4, PTPN11, BBS2, and MED13L (4/61 = 6.6%) and two CNVs, a de novo 22q11.23 deletion, and a de novo 5q21.1q31.1 deletion (2/61 = 3.3%). One case remained unsolved due to the identification of a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in PIEZO2. Three cases revealed unsolicited findings unrelated to the indication for testing. Our findings highlight the diagnostic yield of prenatal CNV- and SNV-testing in cases of suspected isolated clubfoot, but does not support systemic testing for DMPK. Although broad genetic testing can support diagnosis and counseling, challenges remain in interpreting results and managing unsolicited findings.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: Approval from the Medical Ethical Committee of Amsterdam UMC (reference number W21_361 # 21.401). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
References
-
- Sharon-Weiner M, Sukenik-Halevy R, Tepper R, Fishman A, Biron-Shental T, Markovitch O. Diagnostic accuracy, work-up, and outcomes of pregnancies with clubfoot detected by prenatal sonography. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37:754–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5077 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Keret D, Ezra E, Lokiec F, Hayek S, Segev E, Wientroub S. Efficacy of prenatal ultrasonography in confirmed club foot. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2002;84:1015–9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b7.12689 . - DOI
-
- Wang H, Barisic I, Loane M, Addor MC, Bailey LM, Gatt M, et al. Congenital clubfoot in Europe: A population-based study. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179:595–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61067 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Di Mascio D, Buca D, Khalil A, Rizzo G, Makatsariya A, Sileo F, et al. Outcome of isolated fetal talipes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98:1367–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13637 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Leyne E, Anselem O, Jordan P, Vivanti AJ, Benachi A, Salomon L, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of isolated bilateral clubfoot: Is amniocentesis indicated?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103:51–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14716 . - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
