Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 22.
doi: 10.1111/imj.70253. Online ahead of print.

Convalescent plasma in hospitalised patients with COVID-19

Affiliations

Convalescent plasma in hospitalised patients with COVID-19

Zoe McQuilten et al. Intern Med J. .

Abstract

Background: Convalscent plasma (CP) was identified as a potential therapy for COVID-19 available early in the pandemic.

Aims: To evaluate CP for the treatment of hospitalised adults with COVID-19 within the Australasian COVID-19 Trial (ASCOT).

Methods: ASCOT is an investigator-initiated, international, open-label, randomised clinical trial. Adult patients hospitalised with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 within 12 days of symptom onset and not receiving intensive respiratory or vasopressor/inotropic support were randomised to two units of CP or standard care. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who died or required intensive respiratory support (invasive or non-invasive ventilation) or vasopressors/inotropic support in the 28 days after randomisation. The trial steering committee decided to discontinue the study in January 2021 in response to external evidence suggesting the futility of CP.

Results: Between May and November 2020, 33 participants were enrolled from eight sites across Australia and New Zealand. At baseline, nine (53%) in standard care and seven (47%) in CP arms required supplemental oxygen, three participants (all in the CP arm) required non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen and over half were taking dexamethasone. The primary outcome was met by 23.5% (4/17) of standard care and 7% (1/15) of CP participants. One serious adverse event was reported in the CP arm, which was deemed not treatment-related.

Conclusion: Fewer participants allocated to CP died or required new intensive respiratory or vasopressors/inotropic support in the 28 days after randomisation compared to standard care. However, our trial was stopped early in response to external evidence, and our sample size was small, limiting any definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy or safety of CP.

Keywords: COVID‐19; convalescent plasma; hospitalised patients; randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mair‐Jenkins J, Saavedra‐Campos M, Baillie JK, Cleary P, Khaw FM, Lim WS et al. The effectiveness of convalescent plasma and hyperimmune immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe acute respiratory infections of viral etiology: a systematic review and exploratory meta‐analysis. J Infect Dis 2015; 211: 80–90.
    1. Franchini M, Glingani C, Liumbruno GM. Potential mechanisms of action of convalescent plasma in COVID‐19. Diagnosis 2021; 8: 413–420.
    1. Joyner MJ, Wright RS, Fairweather D, Senefeld JW, Bruno KA, Klassen SA et al. Early safety indicators of COVID‐19 convalescent plasma in 5,000 patients. J Clin Invest 2020; 130: 4791–4797.
    1. Group RC. Convalescent plasma in patients admitted to hospital with COVID‐19 (RECOVERY): a randomised controlled, open‐label, platform trial. Lancet 2021; 397: 2049–2059.
    1. Denholm JT, Venkatesh B, Davis J, Bowen AC, Hammond NE, Jha V et al. ASCOT ADAPT study of COVID‐19 therapeutics in hospitalised patients: an international multicentre adaptive platform trial. Trials 2022; 23: 1014.

LinkOut - more resources