Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 20:101704.
doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101704. Online ahead of print.

Cost-utility of point-of-care viscoelastic hemostatic assays in the management of bleeding during cardiac surgery: a single-blinded prospective multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial in French context

Affiliations
Free article

Cost-utility of point-of-care viscoelastic hemostatic assays in the management of bleeding during cardiac surgery: a single-blinded prospective multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial in French context

Mickael Vourc'h et al. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: The IMOTEC study aims to determine whether a point-of-care viscoelastic hemostatic assay (VHA)-guided algorithm is cost-effective for the management of ongoing bleeding.

Methods: Stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, patient blinded, conducted at 16 French academic cardiac surgery centers from 01/2017 to 02/2020. Adults undergoing elective or urgent cardiac surgery with ongoing bleeding were enrolled during 2 successive inclusion periods: 1) transfusion guided on standard hemostasis tests (control period), and 2) transfusion using a VHA-guided algorithm. The primary objective was to estimate the efficiency of VHA based on the 1-year incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR, primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included transfusion, postoperative complications, duration of stay in-hospital, reintervention, and mortality.

Results: 1095 patients were randomized, and 1044 (95.3%) were analyzed. The mean utility was 0.60 (±0.30) in the VHA vs. 0.61 (±0.30) in the control period, adjusted difference, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.09 to 0.07]. The ICUR did not suggest that the VHA-guided algorithm was cost-effective. One-year mortality was 12.0% for VHA and 10.9% for control, Hazard Ratio, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.98 to 2.89], P = .06. The frequency of plasma and platelet transfusions was significantly lower in the VHA compared to the control period (respectively, 48.8% vs. 72.4%, P < 0.0001 and 52.3% vs. 74.1%, P = .0002), whereas fibrinogen administration was more frequent in the VHA period (58.4% vs. 47.0 %, P = .002). The median in-hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the VHA vs. control period: 11.0 days (8.0 to 18.0) vs. 14.0 (9.0 to 22.0), P = .02.

Conclusions: The ICUR did not suggest that VHA was cost-effective in cardiac surgery patients with ongoing bleeding, compared with standard tests.

Trial registration: Clinical trial submission: November 2, 2016 Registry name: Cost-Utility Analysis of Management of Peri Operative Hemorrhage Following Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass (IMOTEC) ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02972684 URL registry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02972684.

Keywords: Cardiac surgery; Ongoing bleeding; Patient blood management; Severe hemorrhage; Transfusion-saving strategy; Viscoelastic hemostatic assays.

PubMed Disclaimer

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources