Impact of a persuasive antimicrobial stewardship program on antibiotic use in patients admitted to emergency department for urinary tract infections: a multicentre prospective study
- PMID: 41275300
- DOI: 10.1186/s13756-025-01653-z
Impact of a persuasive antimicrobial stewardship program on antibiotic use in patients admitted to emergency department for urinary tract infections: a multicentre prospective study
Abstract
Background: The spread of antibiotic resistance makes it necessary to implement Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Programs; the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an AMS program in the management of urinary tract infection (UTI) in emergency setting.
Methods: A prospective multicentre study was conducted enrolling all adult patients admitted to one of the 8 emergency departments participating in the study with a diagnosis of UTI from February 2023 to July 2024. Only one of the eight centers received a persuasive AMS program. The primary outcome evaluated was the prevalence of empirical antimicrobial prescription belonging to Access class according to WHO classification in AMS and non-AMS ED; secondary outcomes included the prevalence of etiologial diagnosis, the clinical response and seven-day and 30-day mortality rates.
Results: During the study period, 657 patients were enrolled, 135 in the AMS and 522 in the non-AMS group, with a median age of 71 years (IQR 58-79). Patients in the AMS group had a more severe disease with a higher rate of sepsis or septic shock at admission (p < 0.001). In the AMS group, the percentage of patients with a microbiological diagnosis was higher (67% vs 43.1% p < 0.001); regarding empirical antibiotic therapy, drugs of the Access class were more frequently prescribed as empirical treatment in the AMS group (48.3 vs 37%, p = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of 7- and 30-day mortality and 7-day clinical response between the 2 groups, despite the higher severity of patients in the AMS group.
Conclusions: In the centre where an AMS program was conducted, an increase in the number of positive urine cultures (67% vs 43.1%) has been observed, and a higher rate of prescriptions for Access class antibiotics. Further prospective data are needed to evaluate the impact of AMS intervention on antimicrobial prescribing in emergency setting.
Keywords: Antimicrobial stewardship; Emergency Department; Empirical treatment; UTI; Urinary tract infections.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples (n◦ 35093/2023). Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Timm MR, Russell SK, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: pathogenesis, host susceptibility and emerging therapeutics. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2025;23(2):72–86.
-
- Schappert SM, Rechtsteiner EA. Ambulatory medical care utilization estimates for 2007. Vital Health Stat 13. 2011;169:1–38.
-
- Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–55.
-
- Li X, Fan H, Zi H, Hu H, Li B, Huang J, et al. Global and regional burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract infections in 2019. J Clin Med. 2022;11(10):2817.
-
- Yadav K, Stahmer A, Mistry RD, May L. An implementation science approach to antibiotic stewardship in emergency departments and urgent care centers. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(1):31–42.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
