Axillary Management and Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in the Randomized PELOPS Trial
- PMID: 41276768
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-18697-5
Axillary Management and Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in the Randomized PELOPS Trial
Abstract
Background: Data to inform surgical management of the axilla after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) are limited. Here we report nodal status, surgical procedure, and outcomes among patients enrolled between 2016 and 2020 in the Palbociclib and Endocrine therapy for LObular breast cancer Preoperative Study (NCT02764541).
Methods: Women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative tumors > 1.5 cm, any cN, were randomized 2:1 to NET ± palbociclib for 24 weeks. Axillary surgery (sentinel lymph node biopsy [SLNB] ± axillary dissection [ALND]) and nodal evaluation (H&E ± IHC) were not specified in the protocol. Pathologic node-positive (ypN+) rates, local-regional recurrence-free interval (LRRFI), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), compared by univariate Cox proportional hazards, were prespecified exploratory endpoints.
Results: A total of 188 patients were analyzed (128 treated with NET + palbociclib, 60 NET), median age 56.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 50-66). 82 (43.6%) had lobular histology, 99 (52.7%) were cN0, 84 (44.7%) cN+, and 5 (2.6%) cN unknown. Of cN+ patients with known ypN, nodal pathologic complete response rates were 10.9% (6/55) after NET + palbociclib and 13.6% (3/22) after NET. Among 108 ypN+ patients, 26 (24.1%) underwent SLNB, 82 (75.9%) ALND, and 99 (91.7%) radiation. At 4.65 years (IQR 3.66-5.56) median follow-up, 3-year LRRFI for ypN+ patients treated with SLNB only was 96% (88.6%, 100%) and ALND was 97.4% (93.9%, 100.0%), p = 0.6; 3-year BCSS for SLNB was 96.0% (88.6%, 100.0%) and ALND was 100.0% (100%, 100%), p = 0.9.
Conclusions: The addition of palbociclib to NET did not impact pathologic nodal outcomes. Among those with ypN+ disease, neither LRRFI nor BCSS appears to be impacted by performance of ALND.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02764541.
Keywords: Axillary lymph node dissection; Axillary management; Axillary surgery; Breast cancer; Clinical trial; Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy; Outcomes.
© 2025. Society of Surgical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: AW reports paid advisory board participation for Abbvie, Merck, and Myriad. She has received honoraria from OncLive (MJH Lifesciences), Empire State Hematology & Oncology Society, Society of Breast Imaging. EAM reports compensated service on scientific advisory boards for AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Merck and Moderna; uncompensated service on steering committees for Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche/Genentech; speakers honoraria and travel support from Merck Sharp & Dohme; and institutional research support from Roche/Genentech (via SU2C grant) and Gilead. EAM also reports research funding from Susan Komen for the Cure for which she serves as a Scientific Advisor, and uncompensated participation as a member of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Board of Directors. OM-F reports research support from Pfizer to institution. TAK reports speaker honoraria for Exact Sciences, compensated service on the FES Steering Committee for GE Healthcare, compensated service for advisory board role for Veracyte, and compensated service as faculty for PrecisCa cancer information service. RJ reports funding from Pfizer for the PELOPS clinical trial; consulting fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Lilly, Carrick Therapeutics; and research funding from Novartis, Lilly, Recursion and Pfizer (institutional funding).
References
-
- Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(2):111–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804710 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Kalinsky K, Barlow WE, Gralow JR, et al. 21-Gene assay to inform chemotherapy benefit in node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(25):2336–47. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2108873 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Spring LM, Gupta A, Reynolds KL, et al. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(11):1477–86. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1897 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cataliotti L, Buzdar AU, Noguchi S, et al. Comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the Pre-Operative “Arimidex” Compared to Tamoxifen (PROACT) trial. Cancer. 2006;106(10):2095–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21872 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J, et al. Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype–ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(17):2342–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.31.6950 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
