Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan-Dec:54:19160216251387622.
doi: 10.1177/19160216251387622. Epub 2025 Nov 24.

Validity and Reliability of the French Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire-10

Affiliations

Validity and Reliability of the French Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire-10

Jérôme R Lechien et al. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

ImportanceMost French Olfactory Questionnaires are time consuming, which may affect the patient participation.ObjectiveTo validate a short French version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire (Fr-ODQ).DesignProspective controlled study.SettingMulticenter study.ParticipantsPatients with long-lasting olfactory dysfunction (OD) treated with platelet-rich plasma into the olfactory clefts and asymptomatic subjects.InterventionDevelopment and validation of a short ODQ.Main OutcomesIndividuals completed the full Fr-ODQ. The Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI) test was performed in OD patients. A combined statistical analysis was performed to determine the most informative items of the Fr-ODQ to develop a shorter version. The internal consistency was determined with Cronbach's alpha. The reliability and external validity were evaluated through a test-retest approach and by correlating with the Fr-ODQ. Both the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the threshold of the short ODQ version were determined.ResultsA total of 263 patients (173 [65.8%] females) and 129 controls (92 [71.3%] females) completed the evaluations. The mean age of patients was 51.2 ± 15.3 years. The mean duration of OD was 42.4 ± 54.3 months. The biostatistical models selected 10 essential items composing the Fr-ODQ-10. The baseline Fr-ODQ-10 was significantly correlated with the TDI (rs = 0.228; P = .001) and the Fr-ODQ (rs = 0.875; P = .001), demonstrating high external validity. Fr-ODQ-10 was significantly lower in controls compared to OD patients (P = .001), highlighting high internal validity. The internal consistency was good (α = .796). The external consistency was adequate, with significant correlations between the test-retest Fr-ODQ-10. The Fr-ODQ-10 significantly decreased from baseline to 4 months post-treatment. A Fr-ODQ-10 score >7.5 was considered abnormal (sensitivity: 84.8%, specificity: 84.2%). The MCID of Fr-ODQ-10 was established at >3.Conclusion and RelevanceThe Fr-ODQ-10 is a valid and reliable clinical instrument, demonstrating correlation with the psychophysical olfactory assessment.

Keywords: Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire; anosmia; odor; olfaction; otolaryngology; rhinology; smell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The Fr-ODQ-10. Fr-ODQ-10, French version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire; OD, Olfactory dysfunction. The total score of Fr-ODQ-10 ranges from 0 (no OD/impact on quality-of-life) to 30 (severe OD with significant impact on quality-of-life).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
An English version of the ODQ-10. Fr-ODQ, French version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire; OD, Olfactory dysfunction; ODQ, Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire. The total score of Fr-ODQ-10 ranges from 0 (no OD/impact on quality-of-life) to 30 (severe OD with significant impact on quality-of-life).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
ROC curve analysis. Fr-ODQ, French version of the Olfactory Disorders Questionnaire, ROC, receiver operating characteristic. A Fr-ODQ-10 >7.5 was considered abnormal (sensitivity: 84.8%, specificity: 84.2%).

References

    1. Desiato VM, Levy DA, Byun YJ, Nguyen SA, Soler ZM, Schlosser RJ. The prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021;35(2):195-205. doi: 10.1177/1945892420946254 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ball S, Boak D, Dixon J, Carrie S, Philpott CM. Barriers to effective health care for patients who have smell or taste disorders. Clin Otolaryngol. 2021;46(6):1213-1222. doi: 10.1111/coa.13818 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Louvrier M, Saussez S, Lechien JR. Psychological distress in patients with long-lasting COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025;54:19160216251328960. doi: 10.1177/19160216251328960 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang J, Pinto JM. The epidemiology of olfactory disorders. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2016;4(2):130-141. doi: 10.1007/s40136-016-0120-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu N, Yang D, Zhang T, Sun J, Fu J, Li H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of olfactory and gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;117:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types