Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Nov 15;16(11):111698.
doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.111698.

Impact of achieving glycated hemoglobin targets on cardiovascular events/mortality: Post-hoc analysis of the nephropathy in diabetes type 2 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Impact of achieving glycated hemoglobin targets on cardiovascular events/mortality: Post-hoc analysis of the nephropathy in diabetes type 2 trial

Alfredo Caturano et al. World J Diabetes. .

Abstract

Background: Achieving optimal glycemic control is a cornerstone of cardiovascular risk reduction in type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the extent to which multifactorial interventions influence this relationship remains uncertain.

Aim: To evaluate the association between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) target achievement and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients receiving standard of care (SoC) or multifactorial intensive therapy (MT).

Methods: This post-hoc analysis of the nephropathy in diabetes type 2 cluster-randomized trial included 323 patients with T2D, albuminuria, and retinopathy (SoC: n = 139; MT: n = 184), who underwent a 4-year intervention phase. Outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Associations with HbA1c target achievement (≤ 7% vs > 7%) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and shared frailty Cox regression models.

Results: During a median follow-up of 12.1 years, 190 MACEs and 139 deaths occurred. Achievement of the HbA1c target was not associated with reduced mortality in either group. However, a significant reduction in MACEs was observed only among SoC patients achieving HbA1c ≤ 7% (P = 0.031), whereas no benefit was seen in the MT group (P = 0.645). In multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for cluster effect, in the MT group age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.07, P < 0.001] and female sex (HR = 0.38, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of MACE, while in the SoC group only age (HR = 1.04, P = 0.009). For all-cause mortality, age (HR = 1.11, P < 0.001) and blood pressure control (HR = 0.55, P = 0.041) were significant predictors in the MT group, whereas age (HR = 1.06, P = 0.002) was independently associated with increased mortality in the SoC group.

Conclusion: In high-risk patients with T2D receiving standard care, achieving an HbA1c ≤ 7% was associated with fewer cardiovascular events only under standard care, but not with reduced mortality. This association was not observed in patients managed with a multifactorial strategy. These findings suggest that the prognostic value of glycemic control depends on the broader treatment context and highlight the central role of comprehensive risk factor management in microvascular-complicated T2D.

Keywords: Cardiovascular diseases; Diabetic complications; Glycated hemoglobin; Multifactorial intervention; Risk factors; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier curves according to glycated hemoglobin target. Curves for major adverse cardiovascular events: A: In the multifactorial intensive therapy (MT) group [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at target: Yes = 119; No = 65]; B: In the standard of care (SoC) group (HbA1c at target: Yes = 60; No = 79); Curves for all-cause mortality: C: In the MT group (HbA1c at target: Yes = 119; No = 65); D: In the SoC group (HbA1c at target: Yes = 60; No = 79). In each panel, red curves indicate patients not at HbA1c target, and blue curves indicate patients at HbA1c target within the corresponding therapy group. MT: Multifactorial intensive therapy; SoC: Standard of care.

References

    1. GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2023;402:203–234. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glovaci D, Fan W, Wong ND. Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21:21. - PubMed
    1. Wright AK, Kontopantelis E, Emsley R, Buchan I, Mamas MA, Sattar N, Ashcroft DM, Rutter MK. Cardiovascular Risk and Risk Factor Management in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Cohort Study Assessing Sex Disparities. Circulation. 2019;139:2742–2753. - PubMed
    1. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Ingelsson E, Lawlor DA, Selvin E, Stampfer M, Stehouwer CD, Lewington S, Pennells L, Thompson A, Sattar N, White IR, Ray KK, Danesh J. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:2215–2222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, Bailey CJ, Ceriello A, Delgado V, Federici M, Filippatos G, Grobbee DE, Hansen TB, Huikuri HV, Johansson I, Jüni P, Lettino M, Marx N, Mellbin LG, Östgren CJ, Rocca B, Roffi M, Sattar N, Seferović PM, Sousa-Uva M, Valensi P, Wheeler DC ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:255–323. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources