Long-term low-voltage impedance measurements in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
- PMID: 41280540
- PMCID: PMC12635742
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.06.002
Long-term low-voltage impedance measurements in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
Abstract
Background: High-voltage impedance (HVI), measured during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation via defibrillation testing or a synchronized shock, is associated with defibrillation efficacy. Recently, S-ICD systems have been upgraded to automatically perform long-term measurements of low-voltage impedance (LVI) using a 1-V subthreshold pulse.
Objective: This study evaluated LVI as a surrogate for HVI and described its long-term trends in S-ICD recipients.
Methods: We analyzed data from 1226 patients who underwent de novo S-ICD implantation across 15 Italian centers. Weekly averages of LVI and HVI were calculated, and agreement between simultaneous measurements was assessed.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 37 months (interquartile range 20-57 months), 373 paired HVI and LVI measurements were analyzed. LVI strongly correlated with HVI (r = 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.88-0.92; P < .001), with a mean bias of -3 Ω (limits of agreement -21 to 14 Ω). The mean LVI increased significantly during the first 3 months postimplantation (from 59 ± 14 to 76 ± 16 Ω; P < .001) before stabilizing (77 ± 17 Ω; P = .231). Higher LVI values were observed in overweight/obese patients when subcutaneous device positioning and the 3-incision lead deployment technique were used. Similarly, higher values were obtained when significant subcoil fat was observed and the Prospective, RAndomizEd comparison of subcuTaneOus and tRansvenous ImplANtable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy score was ≥90.
Conclusion: LVI showed strong agreement with HVI during follow-up, supporting its potential use as a noninvasive surrogate for HVI. LVI increased during the initial postimplantation period and subsequently stabilized, possibly reflecting physiological changes.
Keywords: High-voltage impedance; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Low-voltage impedance; Subcutaneous defibrillator; Sudden cardiac death.
© 2025 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Ottaviano is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Medtronic. Dr Viani receives speaker fees from Boston Scientific. Dr Bianchi is a consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr De Filippo receives modest consulting fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Biotronik as well as honoraria for advisory board participation from Medtronic. Dr Rordorf receives modest speaking fees from Boston Scientific and Abbott. Dr Botto receives speaker fees from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and MicroPort. Ms Lovecchio and Dr Valsecchi are employees of Boston Scientific. Dr Ziacchi receives speaker fees and educational grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and Edwards Lifesciences. The other authors report no conflicts.
Figures
References
-
- Knops R.E., Olde Nordkamp L.R.A., Delnoy P.H.M., et al. Subcutaneous or transvenous defibrillator therapy. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:526–536. - PubMed
-
- Healey J.S., Krahn A.D., Bashir J., et al. Perioperative safety and early patient and device outcomes among subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantations: a randomized, multicenter trial. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175:1658–1665. - PubMed
-
- Heist E.K., Belalcazar A., Stahl W., Brouwer T.F., Knops R.E. Determinants of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator efficacy: a computer modeling study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:405–414. - PubMed
-
- Gold M.R., Aasbo J.D., El-Chami M.F., et al. Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Post-Approval Study: clinical characteristics and perioperative results. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1456–1463. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
