Pre-resection Meningioma Embolization Does Not Improve Time to Recurrence in a Heterogeneous Cohort: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort
- PMID: 41281108
- PMCID: PMC12637861
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.95173
Pre-resection Meningioma Embolization Does Not Improve Time to Recurrence in a Heterogeneous Cohort: A Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort
Abstract
Introduction Meningiomas are the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system, and pre-resection meningioma embolization has been touted to reduce surgical blood loss; however, high-quality evidence supporting its routine employment is lacking. A recent study demonstrated that embolization benefited progression-free recurrence, so we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pre-resection meningioma embosurgery. Methods This retrospective cohort study examined adult patients who underwent intracranial meningioma resection from January 2014 to July 2019. One-to-one propensity score matching was applied. The association of embolization with operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), hemoglobin drop, length of stay, need for blood transfusion, achievement of gross total resection, complication incidence, death within 90 days, tumor recurrence, and time to recurrence was analyzed. Results Of 116 patients meeting study criteria, 32 underwent embolization (28.6%). After excluding World Health Organization grade 2-3 meningiomas and propensity score matching, there were 28 patients in each of the embolization and non-embolization groups. Embolization was not associated with operative time, EBL, post-resection hemoglobin drop, perioperative transfusions, complications, or death. Embolization was associated with increased post-resection length of stay (9.9 + 1.3 days versus 6.6 + 1.3 days, P = 0.002). In survival analysis, embolization was not associated with improved recurrence-free survival. Conclusions While meningioma embolization appears safe, its long-term efficacy is unclear. Embosurgery was not associated with increased time to recurrence in this patient cohort, but the observed results may be due to differences in technique, tumor genomics, or patient selection. Prospective, randomized studies are warranted for further investigation.
Keywords: central nervous system neoplasms; embolization; endovascular procedures; meningioma; neurosurgery.
Copyright © 2025, Nguyen et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Baylor Scott & White Research IRB issued approval 018-755. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Alruwaili AA, De Jesus O. StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Meningioma. - PubMed
-
- Preserved arachnoid membrane acts as a predictor of postoperative visual improvement in clinoidal meningioma. Kimura Y, Wanibuchi M, Akiyama Y, Mikami T, Mikuni N. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021;208:106874. - PubMed
-
- Embolization by catheterization of intracranial meningiomas. (Article in French) Manelfe C, Guiraud B, David J, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4794375/ Rev Neurol (Paris) 1973;128:339–351. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources