Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2025 Oct 28:arXiv:2510.24359v1.

An N-of-1 Artificial Intelligence Ecosystem for Precision Medicine

Affiliations

An N-of-1 Artificial Intelligence Ecosystem for Precision Medicine

P Fard et al. ArXiv. .

Abstract

Artificial intelligence in medicine is built to serve the average patient. By minimizing error across large datasets, most systems deliver strong aggregate accuracy yet falter at the margins: patients with rare variants, multimorbidity, or underrepresented demographics. This average patient fallacy erodes both equity and trust. We propose a different design: a multi-agent ecosystem for N-of-1 decision support. In this environment, agents clustered by organ systems, patient populations, and analytic modalities draw on a shared library of models and evidence synthesis tools. Their results converge in a coordination layer that weighs reliability, uncertainty, and data density before presenting the clinician with a decision-support packet: risk estimates bounded by confidence ranges, outlier flags, and linked evidence. Validation shifts from population averages to individual reliability, measured by error in low-density regions, calibration in the small, and risk-coverage trade-offs. Anticipated challenges include computational demands, automation bias, and regulatory fit, addressed through caching strategies, consensus checks, and adaptive trial frameworks. By moving from monolithic models to orchestrated intelligence, this approach seeks to align medical AI with the first principle of medicine: care that is transparent, equitable, and centered on the individual.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Summary panel: error vs. density (tail shaded), risk–coverage (solid = monolith; dashed = multi-agent), tail calibration (ECE), x3 diagnostic for cluster D, ROC for cluster D (ΔAUC = 0.406; p ≈ 3.9 × 10−8), and population vs. tail bars (overall ΔAUC = 0.013; tail ΔAUC = 0.035).

References

    1. van Kolfschooten H. The AI cycle of health inequity and digital ageism: mitigating biases through the EU regulatory framework on medical devices. J Law Biosci. 2023;10(2):lsad031. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hasanzadeh F, Josephson CB, Waters G, Adedinsewo D, Azizi Z, White JA. Bias recognition and mitigation strategies in artificial intelligence healthcare applications. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8(1):154. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azhir A, Murphy SN, Estiri H. The Average Patient Fallacy. arXiv. 2025; 10.48550/arXiv.2509.26474. - DOI
    1. Cross JL, Choma MA, Onofrey JA. Bias in medical AI: Implications for clinical decision-making. PLOS Digit Health. 2024;3(11):e0000651. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zou J, Schiebinger L. Ensuring that biomedical AI benefits diverse populations. EBioMedicine. 2021;67(103358):103358. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources