MAPK-driven epithelial cell plasticity drives colorectal cancer therapeutic resistance
- PMID: 41286180
- PMCID: PMC12916511
- DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-09916-w
MAPK-driven epithelial cell plasticity drives colorectal cancer therapeutic resistance
Abstract
The colorectal epithelium is rapidly renewing, with remarkable capacity to regenerate following injury. In colorectal cancer (CRC), this regenerative capacity can be co-opted to drive epithelial plasticity. Although oncogenic MAPK signalling in CRC is common, with frequent mutations of both KRAS (40-50%) and BRAF (10%)1, inhibition of this pathway typically drives resistance clinically. Here, given the development of KRAS inhibitors and licensing of BRAF inhibitor combinations2-4, we have interrogated key mechanisms of resistance to these agents in advanced preclinical CRC models. We show that oncogenic MAPK signalling induces epithelial-state changes in vivo, driving adoption of a regenerative/revival stem-like population, whereas inhibition leads to rapid transcriptional remodelling of both Kras-mutant and Braf-mutant tumours, favouring a WNT-associated, canonical stem phenotype. This drives acute therapeutic resistance in Kras-driven and delayed resistance in Braf-driven models. Where plasticity is restrained, such as in early metastatic disease, or through targeting ligand-dependent WNT pathway Rnf43 mutations, marked therapeutic responses are observed. This explains the super response to BRAF + EGFR-targeted therapies previously observed in a BRAF-RNF43 co-mutant patient population, highlighting the criticality of cellular plasticity in therapeutic response. Together, our data provide clear insight into the mechanisms underpinning resistance to MAPK-targeted therapies in CRC. Moreover, strategies that aim to corral stem cell fate, restrict epithelial plasticity or intervene when tumours lack heterogeneity may improve therapeutic efficacy of these agents.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: M.W. declares honoraria from Servier; and travel, accommodation and/or expenses from Servier and Merck unrelated to this research. S.S. declares ownership of PathGen Diagnostik Teknologi unrelated to this research. J.S.G. declares external funding from Pierre Fabre and Merck unrelated to this research. S.J.R. and S.T.B. are employees of and shareholders in AstraZeneca. R.H.W. declares honoraria from Servier; consultancy and/or advisory for Alcimed, Amgen, Amphista Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CV6 therapeutics, Nucana, Pierre Fabre and the RIN Institute; and travel, accommodation and/or expenses from Amgen, Merck KGaA, NuCAna, Pierre Fabre and Takeda, all unrelated to this research. S.T. declares honoraria from Merck Serono, Regeneron, BMS, MSD, Roche and Sanofi; consultancy and/or advisory for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Serono, Regeneron and Roche/Genentech; and travel, accommodation and/or expenses from Amgen, Bayer, Merck Serono, Roche and Sanofi, all unrelated to this research. A.D.C. declares external funding from AstraZeneca. O.J.S. declares external funding from AstraZeneca, and funding from Novartis and Boehringer Ingelheim unrelated to this research. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
