Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 24;25(1):1512.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13545-4.

Healthcare quality in rural Armenia: Focus group perceptions : Healthcare quality in rural Armenia

Affiliations

Healthcare quality in rural Armenia: Focus group perceptions : Healthcare quality in rural Armenia

Catherine Manukyan et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Previous studies in Armenia have found low healthcare quality and satisfaction, with significant barriers to healthcare access and high out-of-pocket spending, especially in rural areas. This study is the first to utilize focus groups to better understand patient perceptions of healthcare quality in rural Armenia. Study participants were volunteers, mostly women and teachers, among 15 rural Armenian villages. Using the Lévesque model, we assessed participant responses using the domains of approachability, acceptability, availability and accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness. Our study found that many residents have low trust in physicians and the healthcare system, and associate higher quality of care with increased diagnostic testing and sub-specialty care. The interpersonal component of healthcare was an important factor in determining quality of care; residents voiced that high quality is characterized by providers who communicate clearly, have a compassionate demeanor, value patient preferences, and support patient autonomy. Residents also expressed positivity towards low cost of care. When discussing the quality of providers, residents noted that providers should communicate test results, and generally keep patients informed throughout the treatment process. In discussing barriers to access, residents noted poor roads and inconsistent physician availability. Our findings align with observations from studies in other LMIC settings on the topic of perceptions of healthcare quality while providing a more comprehensive understanding of previously reported low patient satisfaction rates and low quality of care in Armenia. We have provided targeted recommendations to improve rural healthcare in Armenia that include implementation of patient-centered care, required trainings for physicians and nurses, system-level strategies for improved utilization and outcomes, and co-produced health campaigns.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-025-13545-4.

Keywords: Armenia; Barriers to care; Community health; Focus group; Healthcare perceptions; Healthcare quality; LMICs; Lévesque model; Rural health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics and consent to participate: Informed, verbal consent was acquired from each participant before focus group sessions and confidentiality was assured. Session facilitators witnessed and documented the consent in their field notes. Facilitators received IRB approval from The Ethics Committee of Yerevan State Medical University and all research was conducted in accordance with the WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of study area in Lori province

References

    1. Hovhannisyan S. Health care in Armenia. BMJ. 2004;329(7465):522. 10.1136/bmj.329.7465.522. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rechel B, Richardson E, McKee M. Trends in health systems in the former Soviet countries. Eur Observatory Health Syst Policies; 2014. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK458305/ - PubMed
    1. Sheiman I, Shishkin S, Shevsky V. The evolving Semashko model of primary health care: the case of the Russian federation. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2018;11:209–20. 10.2147/RMHP.S168399. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubinstein A. Medical care in the Soviet union. Curr Hist. 1963;44(262):339–44.
    1. Chekijian S, Truzyan N, Stepanyan T, Bazarchyan A. Healthcare in transition in the Republic of armenia: the evolution of emergency medical systems and directions forward. Int J Emerg Med. 2021;14:3. 10.1186/s12245-020-00328-3. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources