Comparison of Postoperative Telerehabilitation and Unsupervised Home-Based Training in Older Adults With Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 41294889
- DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000988
Comparison of Postoperative Telerehabilitation and Unsupervised Home-Based Training in Older Adults With Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the effects of postoperative pulmonary telerehabilitation (PTR) in older adults with lung cancer using a popular mobile instant messenger.
Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in ambulatory patients (n = 64; aged ≥ 65 years) with lung cancer scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention (IG) or control (CG) groups. Four weeks after surgery, both groups received a one-time education session on standard home-based pulmonary rehabilitation at the rehabilitation center. The IG underwent a PTR program thrice weekly for 4 weeks using a mobile instant messenger or telephone. Both groups were instructed to maintain their exercise routine (at least 3 times a week) during the 4-week follow-up.
Results: Compared with the CG, the IG showed significant improvements in peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and percent predicted VO2peak of 3.3 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 1.9-4.8; P < .001) and 14% (95% CI, 7-21; P < .001), respectively, after PTR. These improvements persisted at the 4-week follow-up (VO2peak = 3.8 mL/kg/min: 95% CI, 2.1-5.5; P < .001 and percent predicted VO2peak = 13%: 95% CI, 6-20; P < .001). Compared with preoperative values, postoperative VO2peak and percent predicted VO2peak decreased significantly by 3.5 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 2.6-4.3; P < .001) and 15% (95% CI, 11-19; P < .001), respectively.
Conclusions: A 4-week postoperative PTR program improved VO2peak in older adults with lung cancer. Our findings suggest that PTR may be a feasible therapeutic strategy for lung cancer, even in older adults.
Keywords: lung cancer; pulmonary telerehabilitation; randomized controlled trial; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Bade BC, Thomas DD, Scott JB, Silvestri GA. Increasing physical activity and exercise in lung cancer: reviewing safety, benefits, and application. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(6):861-871.
-
- Schulte T, Schniewind B, Dohrmann P, Küchler T, Kurdow R. The extent of lung parenchyma resection significantly impacts long-term quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2009;135(2):322-329.
-
- Curigliano G, Mayer EL, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A. Cardiac toxicity from systemic cancer therapy: a comprehensive review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;53(2):94-104.
-
- Jones LW, Watson D, Herndon JE, et al. Peak oxygen consumption and long-term all-cause mortality in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(20):4825-4832.
-
- Rosero ID, Ramírez-Vélez R, Lucia A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on preoperative physical exercise interventions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(7):944.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
