Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 26;17(1):201.
doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-02017-5.

DOT1L inhibition exerts the anti-tumor effect by activating interferon signaling in breast cancer cells

Affiliations

DOT1L inhibition exerts the anti-tumor effect by activating interferon signaling in breast cancer cells

Ayano Yoshido et al. Clin Epigenetics. .

Abstract

Background: DOT1L, a histone H3 lysine 79 (H3K79) methyltransferase, is a potential therapeutic target in various malignancies. In the present study, we aimed to clarify the anti-tumor effect of DOT1L inhibition in breast cancer.

Methods: Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer cells (MCF7) and ER-negative/HER2-positive cells (SKBR3) were treated with a DOT1L inhibitor (SGC0946, EPZ-5676), after which colony formation assays, cell cycle assays, flow cytometry, gene expression microarray analysis, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and single-cell Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin sequencing (scATAC-seq) were performed. Genetic ablation of STING was performed using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Results: Treatment with a DOT1L inhibitor suppressed proliferation and induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in both ER-positive/HER2-negative and ER-negative/HER2-positive cells. Transcriptome and epigenome analysis revealed that DOT1L inhibition activated transcription of a number of interferon (IFN)-related genes (IRGs) in breast cancer cells. We also found that DOT1L inhibition upregulated type I and type III IFNs as well as cell surface human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I expression. Notably, DOT1L inhibition induced DNA damage and upregulated levels of cytoplasmic DNA in breast cancer cells. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of STING in breast cancer cells significantly suppressed the IFN signaling activated by DOT1L inhibition and attenuated the anti-tumor effect. Moreover, scATAC-seq analysis revealed that DOT1L inhibition suppressed expression of ERBB2 in HER2-positive breast cancer cells.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the anti-breast cancer effect of DOT1L inhibition is mediated by multiple mechanisms, including activation of innate immune signaling.

Keywords: DNA damage; DOT1L; Immune response; Interferon; STING.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Sapporo Medical University (4-1-57). Written informed consent was obtained from the donor before blood collection. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The anti-tumor effects of DOT1L inhibitors in breast cancer cells. A Western blot analysis of H3K79me1, H3K79me2 and H3K79me3 in MCF7 and SKBR3 cells treated for 12 days with DMSO, SGC0946 (SGC) or EPZ-5676 (EPZ). Total histone H3 is shown as an endogenous control. B Colony formation assays in breast cancer cells treated with DMSO or the indicated DOT1L inhibitor. Representative results are shown on the left, and summarized results are on the right. (n = 3). C, D Cell cycle (C) and apoptosis (D) analyses in breast cancer cells treated for 9 days with DMSO or the indicated DOT1L inhibitor. Representative results are shown on the left, and summarized results are on the right. (n = 3). Error bars represent SDs. ***P < 0.001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
DOT1L inhibition activates interferon (IFN) signaling in breast cancer cells. A Gene expression microarray analysis in MCF7 (left) and SKBR3 (right) cells treated for 6 days with DMSO or SGC0946. Summarized results of GSEA using genes upregulated by SGC0946 are shown. NES, normalized enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate. B Results of GSEA of the hallmark IFN-α response gene set in breast cancer cells treated for 6 days with the indicated DOT1L inhibitor. C Heatmaps showing the microarray data of the hallmark IFN-α response genes in breast cancer cells treated with DMSO, SGC0946 (SGC) or EPZ-5676 (EPZ) for indicated periods. D qRT-PCR analysis of the indicated IFN-related genes (IRGs) in breast cancer cells treated for 6 days with DMSO (D), SGC0946 (S) or EPZ-5676 (E). (n = 3). Error bars represent SDs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
DOT1L inhibition upregulates HLA expression in breast cancer cells. A Heatmap showing microarray data of HLA genes in MCF7 cells treated with DMSO, SGC0946 (SGC) or EPZ-5676 (EPZ) for indicated periods. B Flow cytometry analysis showing cell surface expression of HLA class I and II molecules in MCF7 cell lines treated with indicated agents for 6 days
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
DOT1L inhibition activates IFN-Stat1 signaling in breast cancer cells. A Heatmaps showing histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) peaks detected by ChIP-seq analysis in MCF7 and SKBR3 cells treated for 6 days with DMSO, SGC0946 (SGC) or EPZ-5676 (EPZ). B Motif analysis of H3K4me3 peaks in (A) in breast cancer cells treated as indicated. C qRT-PCR analysis of the indicated IFN genes in MCF7 cells treated for 6 days and SKBR3 cells treated for 9 days with the indicated agents. D ELISA of IFN-λ in MCF7 cells treated for 6 days with the indicated agents. E Western blot analysis of total and phosphorylated Stat1 in MCF7 cells treated for 6 days and SKBR3 cells treated for 9 days with indicated agents. Error bars represent SDs. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The STING pathway is involved in the DOT1L inhibition-induced IFN signaling in breast cancer cells. A Western blot analysis of histone H3 and γH2AX in the cytoplasm of MCF7 and SKBR3 cells treated for 6 days with DMSO, SGC0946 (SGC) or EPZ-5676 (EPZ). B qRT-PCR of CXCL10 in breast cancer cells treated for 6 days with the indicated agents. (n = 3). C Western blot analysis of total and phosphorylated Stat1 and STING in control and STING knockout (KO) MCF7 cells treated for 6 days with the indicated agents. D Results of RNA-seq analysis in control and STING KO MCF7 cells. Summarized results of GSEA of the indicated gene sets using genes downregulated in KO cells are shown. E Heatmap showing expression levels of the hallmark IFN-α response genes in control and STING KO MCF7 cells treated for 6 days with the indicated agents. F GSEA of the hallmark IFN-α response gene set in control and STING KO MCF7 cells treated for 6 days with the indicated agents. G qRT-PCR analysis of the indicated IFN genes and IRGs in control and STING KO MCF7 cells treated for 6 days with DMSO (D), SGC0946 (S) or EPZ-5676 (E). (n = 3). Error bars represent SDs. ***P < 0.001
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The STING pathway contributes to the anti-tumor effect of DOT1L inhibition in breast cancer cells. A Colony formation assays in control and STING knockout (KO) MCF7 cells treated with DMSO, SGC0946 or EPZ-5676. Representative results are shown on the left, and summarized results are on the right. (n = 3). B, C Cell cycle (B) and apoptosis (C) assays in control and STING KO MCF7 cells treated for 9 days with DMSO, SGC0946 (SGC) or EPZ-5676 (EPZ). Representative results are shown on the left, and summarized results are on the right. NS, not significant; ***P < 0.001
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Single-cell ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq) analysis in SKBR3 cells treated with a DOT1L inhibitor. A Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) of the scATAC-seq data from SKBR3 cells treated with DMSO, SGC0946 (SGC) or EPZ-5676 (EPZ). Results of unsupervised clustering are shown on the right. B Proportions of the respective clusters in cells treated as indicated. C Summarized results of a pseudotime analysis of motifs identified by scATAC-seq. D Results of a pseudotime trajectory analysis of IRF1 and STAT1 motifs. E Gene scores of representative IRGs. F Gene scores of ERBB2 gene. G Results of a qRT-PCR analysis of ERBB2 in SKBR3 cells treated with the indicated agents. (n = 3). H Results of ChIP-seq analysis showing levels of H3K4me3 at the ERBB2 gene in SKBR3 cells treated as indicated

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63. - PubMed
    1. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(19):10869–74. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, et al. Breast Cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(6):691–722. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kang C, Syed YY. Atezolizumab (in combination with Nab-Paclitaxel): a review in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. Drugs. 2020;80(6):601–7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laisne M, Lupien M, Vallot C. Epigenomic heterogeneity as a source of tumour evolution. Nat Rev Cancer. 2025;25(1):7–26. - DOI - PubMed