Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec;35(12):e70174.
doi: 10.1111/sms.70174.

Velocity-Matched Resisted and Unresisted Sprinting Across Broad Loads Show Minor Biomechanical Differences

Edson Soares da Silva  1 , Aleš Dolenec  2 , Matt R Cross  3 , Pierre Samozino  4 , Jérémy Rossi  1 , Jean-Benoit Morin  1
Affiliations

Velocity-Matched Resisted and Unresisted Sprinting Across Broad Loads Show Minor Biomechanical Differences

Edson Soares da Silva et al. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Many comparisons of unresisted and resisted sprinting do not match running velocity. As such, differences may partly reflect velocity rather than resistance. This cross-sectional study examined kinetic and kinematic differences between unresisted and resisted sprinting accelerations at matched running velocities. Fourteen amateur sportsmen performed unresisted and resisted maximal overground sprints. Motorized resistance was applied via the waist and set at 20%, 40%, and 60% decreases in maximal unresisted velocity (VDEC). Ground reaction forces and segment/joint angles were compared across velocity-matched steps between the conditions using ANOVA and statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Longer contact times were observed for resisted versus the unresisted condition, specifically 6.4% and 16.8% at 40% and 60% VDEC (ES: -0.423; -0.851, respectively). Vertical impulse was 8.0%, 7.3%, and 14.6% greater in the resisted condition at 20%, 40%, and 60% VDEC, (ES: -0.788; -0.551; and -0.862, respectively). Ankle range of motion was 5.8° greater at 60% VDEC (ES: -1.064), and hip angle at toe-off was 2.8° and 8.3° greater at 40% and 60% VDEC, (ES: -0.385; -0.987, respectively), compared to unresisted sprinting. No other statistically significant differences were observed. SPM analyses indicated differences only between kinetics at 20% VDEC and ankle and trunk angles at 20% and 60% VDEC. Our findings contrast the larger and consistent changes typically reported in resisted sprinting, indicating movement velocity may be a confounder. The comparatively modest remaining differences detected may reflect load-specific mechanisms that deserve future study.

Keywords: kinematics; kinetics; load; sprint performance; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. G. Petrakos, J. B. Morin, and B. Egan, “Resisted Sled Sprint Training to Improve Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review,” Sports Medicine 46, no. 3 (2016): 381–400, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279‐015‐0422‐8.
    1. N. Sugisaki, H. Tsuchie, Y. Takai, et al., “Validity of Spatiotemporal and Ground Reaction Force Estimates During Resisted Sprinting With a Motorized Loading Device,” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 34, no. 1 (2024): 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14597.
    1. S. Gleadhill, N. Yuki, T. Wada, and R. Nagahara, “Kinetic and Kinematic Characteristics of Sprint Running With a Weighted Vest,” Journal of Biomechanics 126 (2021): 110655, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110655.
    1. S. Gleadhill and R. Nagahara, “Kinetic and Kinematic Changes During Resisted Sprinting due to Towing Three Common Parachute Sizes,” Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 63, no. 2 (2023): 256–263, https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022‐4707.22.14068‐5.
    1. M. R. Cross, F. Tinwala, S. Lenetsky, P. Samozino, M. Brughelli, and J. B. Morin, “Determining Friction and Effective Loading for Sled Sprinting,” Journal of Sports Sciences 35, no. 22 (2017): 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1261178.

LinkOut - more resources