Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Feb;17(1):117-127.
doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01364-z. Epub 2025 Nov 28.

Arm circumference predicts 12-month mortality in older adults with hip fracture

Collaborators, Affiliations

Arm circumference predicts 12-month mortality in older adults with hip fracture

Chiara Ceolin et al. Eur Geriatr Med. 2026 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Hip fractures (HF) in older adults are a major public health issue due to their high incidence and association with mortality and long-term disability. Simple bedside measures reflecting nutritional and muscular status-such as handgrip strength (HGS), arm circumference, and calf circumference-may help identify patients at higher risk of adverse outcomes. This study compared the predictive value of these parameters for 1-year mortality in older adults hospitalized for hip fracture.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 295 patients aged ≥65 years admitted for fragility HF at the Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova. Demographic, clinical, and anthropometric data were collected at admission, along with a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Twelve-month mortality was the primary outcome. Prognostic value was assessed using ROC curves, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariable Cox regression.

Results: At 12 months, mortality was higher among patients with low arm (27.1%) and calf circumference (28.8%) (p = 0.008 and p = 0.010), while no difference was observed for HGS. ROC curve analysis showed that arm (AUC = 0.704, p < 0.001) and calf circumference (AUC = 0.634, p = 0.006) were associated with mortality, unlike HGS (p = 0.307). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed lower survival in patients with arm and calf circumference under 20th percentile, defined, respectively, low arm and calf (log-rank p = 0.003 and p = 0.02, respectively). In Cox models, low arm circumference remained independently associated with mortality across all adjustments (HR = 2.86; 95% CI 1.45-5.64; p = 0.002), whereas the association for calf circumference lost significance.

Conclusion: Arm circumference is a simple, cost-effective, and reliable bedside tool to help identify older adults at increased risk of mortality after HF.

Keywords: Arm circumference; Fracture liaison service; Fragility hip fractures; Handgrip strength.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: All authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Human and animal rights statement and ethics approval: The study was performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. The study was authorized by the local Ethics Committee (Comitato Etico Territoriale Area Centro-Est Veneto, 442n/AO/23). The committee provided ethical approval for the research protocol, ensuring that the study complies with the ethical standards for research involving human participants. Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained for all study participants; in case of impossibility to sign the informed consent, such as in severely ill patients or patients with dementia, informed consent was signed by patient’s legal guardian.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of arm circumference, calf circumference, and handgrip strength for predicting 12-month mortality: a ROC curve analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier curves stratified according to the 20th percentile of arm (a) and calf (b) circumferences

References

    1. Sing CW, Lin TC, Bartholomew S et al (2023) Global epidemiology of hip fractures: secular trends in incidence rate, post-fracture treatment, and all-cause mortality. J Bone Miner Res 38(8):1064–1075. 10.1002/jbmr.4821 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kanis JA, Odén A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl DA, Cooper C (2012) A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int J Establ as result Coop between Eur Found Osteoporos Natl Osteoporos Found USA 23(9):2239–2256. 10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shen Y, Tan B, Zhang J, Zhang N, Wang Z (2025) Epidemiology and disease burden of fractures in Asia, 1990-2021: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. J Orthop Transl 52:281–290. 10.1016/j.jot.2025.04.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ceolin C, Bano G, Biz C et al (2023) Functional autonomy and 12-month mortality in older adults with proximal femoral fractures in an orthogeriatric setting: risk factors and gender differences. Aging Clin Exp Res 35(5):1063–1071. 10.1007/s40520-023-02378-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nazrun AS, Tzar MN, Mokhtar SA, Mohamed IN (2014) A systematic review of the outcomes of osteoporotic fracture patients after hospital discharge: morbidity, subsequent fractures, and mortality. Ther Clin Risk Manag 10:937–948 - PMC - PubMed