Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec;90(12):e70720.
doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.70720.

The Sensory and Physicochemical Properties of Honeybush Tea Depend on the Brewing Water: A Preliminary Study

Affiliations

The Sensory and Physicochemical Properties of Honeybush Tea Depend on the Brewing Water: A Preliminary Study

Helene van Schoor et al. J Food Sci. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

This study investigated how different water types affected honeybush (Cyclopia species) tea quality. Water types, varying in physicochemical properties, were used to brew tea from three honeybush species: C. intermedia, C. subternata, and C. genistoides (n = 6/species). The water types were deionized water (W1), two bottled spring waters (W2, W3), bottled reverse osmosis water (W4), brackish water (W5), and tap water (W6). Descriptive sensory analysis was used to determine whether water type affected the sensory profile of the infusions. Other parameters included CIEL*a*b* color and turbidity, as well as the soluble solids and phenolic content of the infusions. Results showed that water with the highest pH (W3; pH = 8.3) and high EC (W3 and W5; EC >10 mS/m) negatively impacted the sensory profile of honeybush tea. Infusions made with W3 and W5 had a 'date pudding' aroma, which was uncharacteristic of honeybush, and lower intensities of typical floral and sweet-associated honeybush aromas. These water samples also led to a salty taste, thick mouthfeel, and much darker color. Additionally, the concentrations of phenolic compounds, such as 3-β-D-glucopyranosyl-4-O-β-D-glucopyranosyliriflophenone, mangiferin, and isomangiferin, were reduced. Infusions prepared with W2, W4, and W6 (pH between 5.3 and 7.8; EC <10 mS/m) showed similar sensory and physicochemical profiles to those prepared with deionized water (pH = 7.1; EC = 0 mS/m). PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: For the best-tasting honeybush tea, consumers should use water treated by reverse osmosis, with guaranteed low mineral content. This information will help producers and tea merchants present the true flavor of honeybush tea during tastings, supporting effective marketing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Principal component analysis bi‐plot representing the association between selected sensory attributes (attributes where all values <5 were removed) and “cup‐of‐tea” Cyclopia intermedia infusions prepared with water from different sources (n = 6). Sample labels indicate C. intermedia (I) infusion, followed by the water sample used to prepare the infusion (W1–W6), and lastly the C. intermedia sample number (IW1_1 = infusion prepared with W1 and C. intermedia sample 1). A indicates aroma attribute and F indicates flavor attribute. Attributes in bold font are generic honeybush sensory attributes, while those in italic bold font are defining characteristics of the specific species. W1, deionized water; W2, bottled still spring water from Ceres, South Africa; W3, bottled still spring water from Normandien, South Africa; W4, bottled reverse osmosis water from Oasis, Stellenbosch, South Africa; W5, brackish borehole water from a farm in Greyton, South Africa; W6, tap water from Stellenbosch, South Africa.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Principal component analysis bi‐plot representing the association between selected sensory attributes (attributes where all values <5 were removed) and "cup‐of‐tea" Cyclopia subternata infusions prepared with water from different sources (n = 6). Sample labels indicate C. subternata (S) infusion, followed by the water sample used to prepare the infusion (W1–W6), and lastly the C. subternata sample number (SW1_1 = infusion prepared with W1 and C. subternata sample 1). A indicates aroma attribute and F indicates flavor attribute. Attributes in bold font are generic honeybush sensory attributes, while those in italic bold font are defining characteristics of the specific species. W1, deionized water; W2, bottled still spring water from Ceres, South Africa; W3, bottled still spring water from Normandien, South Africa; W4, bottled reverse osmosis water from Oasis, Stellenbosch, South Africa; W5, brackish borehole water from a farm in Greyton, South Africa; W6, tap water from Stellenbosch, South Africa.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Principal component analysis bi‐plot representing the association between selected sensory attributes (attributes where all values <5 were removed) and "cup‐of‐tea" Cyclopia genistoides infusions prepared with water from different sources (n = 6). Sample labels indicate C. genistoides (G) infusion, followed by the water sample used to prepare the infusion (W1–W6), and lastly the C. genistoides sample number (GW1_1 = infusion prepared with W1 and C. genistoides sample 1). A indicates aroma attribute and F indicates flavor attribute. Attributes in bold font are generic honeybush sensory attributes, while those in italic bold font are defining characteristics of the specific species. W1, deionized water; W2, bottled still spring water from Ceres, South Africa; W3, bottled still spring water from Normandien, South Africa; W4, bottled reverse osmosis water from Oasis, Stellenbosch, South Africa; W5, brackish borehole water from a farm in Greyton, South Africa; W6, tap water from Stellenbosch, South Africa.

References

    1. Alexander, L. , De Beer D., Muller M., Van der Rijst M., and Joubert E.. 2019a. “Bitter Profiling of Phenolic Fractions of Green Cyclopia genistoides Herbal Tea.” Food Chemistry 276: 626–635. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexander, L. , De Beer D., Muller M., Van der Rijst M., and Joubert E.. 2019b. “Potential of Benzophenones and Flavanones to Modulate the Bitter Intensity of Cyclopia genistoides Herbal Tea.” Food Research International 125: 108519. 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108519. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alexander, L. , Moelich E. I., De Beer D., Muller M., Walczak B., and Joubert E.. 2021. “High‐Temperature Oxidation Reduces the Bitterness of Honeybush Infusions Depending on Changes in Phenolic Composition.” LWT 139: 110608. 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110608. - DOI
    1. The Determination of Alkalinity and Acidity in Water 1981 . 1982. H.M. Stationery Office. https://standingcommitteeofanalysts.co.uk/wp‐content/uploads/Blue_Book_L....
    1. Beelders, T. , De Beer D., Kidd M., and Joubert E.. 2018. “Modeling of Thermal Degradation Kinetics of the C‐Glucosyl Xanthone Mangiferin in an Aqueous Model Solution as a Function of pH and Temperature and Protective Effect of Honeybush Extract Matrix.” Food Research International 103: 103–109. 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.020. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources