The impact of PEEP-guided electrical impedance tomography on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in moderate-to-severe ARDS: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 41318662
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-29787-5
The impact of PEEP-guided electrical impedance tomography on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in moderate-to-severe ARDS: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration may optimize ventilation and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We compared EIT-guided PEEP with low PEEP/FiO₂ strategy in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. In this randomized controlled trial, 108 patients with PaO₂/FiO₂ below 200 mmHg were allocated to EIT-guided PEEP after a recruitment maneuver (n = 56) or low PEEP/FiO₂ strategy (n = 52). Patients in the EIT group underwent PEEP titration guided by the intersection point between alveolar overdistension and collapse during a decremental PEEP trial. Primary outcomes were oxygenation (PaO₂/FiO₂) and static compliance. Secondary outcomes included mortality, ventilator-free days, ICU stay, barotrauma, rescue therapies, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score changes. On day 1, oxygenation was higher with EIT (mean PaO₂/FiO₂ 180 vs. 159 mmHg; p = 0.036). Static compliance was greater at both day 1 (26 vs. 23 mL/cmH₂O; p = 0.016) and day 2 (27 vs. 24 mL/cmH₂O; p = 0.029). Driving pressure was lower with EIT at day 1 (16 vs. 17 cmH₂O; p < 0.001) and day 2 (15 vs. 17 cmH₂O; p = 0.005). SOFA scores improved more in the EIT group (day 1: - 1 vs. 0, p = 0.013; day 2: - 1 vs. - 0.5, p = 0.015). Twenty-eight-day mortality was lower with EIT (29 vs. 44%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.090). ICU stay, ventilation duration, barotrauma, ECMO use, and rescue therapies were similar. Benefits were most pronounced in patients with severe ARDS. EIT-guided PEEP improved oxygenation, lung mechanics, and reduced organ dysfunction in moderate-to-severe ARDS, particularly in severe cases. It showed a trend toward reduced mortality and may serve as a practical bedside tool for lung-protective ventilation. Larger multicenter trials are needed to confirm its clinical benefits.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials, NCT06733168. Registered on 13/12/2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06733168.
Keywords: ARDS; Electrical impedance tomography; Oxygenation; PEEP; Respiratory mechanics.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Bach Mai Hospital Ethics Committee, Vietnam (Approval Number: 5532/BM-HDDD). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and reported following the CONSORT guidelines.
References
-
- Matthay, M. A. et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 5(1), 18 (2019).
-
- Bellani, G. et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA 315(8), 788–800 (2016).
-
- Beitler, J. R., Malhotra, A. & Thompson, B. T. Ventilator-induced lung injury. Clin. Chest Med. 37(4), 633–646 (2016).
-
- Grotberg, J. C., Reynolds, D. & Kraft, B. D. Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a primer. Crit. Care 27(1), 289 (2023).
-
- Qadir, N. et al. An update on management of adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: an official american thoracic society clinical practice guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 209(1), 24–36 (2024).
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
