Incidence of treatment intensification based on HbA1c trends in people with type 2 diabetes
- PMID: 41318984
- DOI: 10.1111/jdi.70200
Incidence of treatment intensification based on HbA1c trends in people with type 2 diabetes
Abstract
Aims: Clinical inertia, the failure to intensify treatment despite unmet glycemic goals, is a key factor in poor glycemic management for type 2 diabetes. No studies have defined clinical inertia based on HbA1c trends. In this study, we aimed to assess treatment intensification according to HbA1c trends.
Materials and methods: We analyzed data from the Japan Diabetes Comprehensive Database Project based on an Advanced Electronic Medical Record System (J-DREAMS) between 2016 and 2023. Eligible patients with type 2 diabetes had (1) unchanged prescriptions for the past 90 days; (2) two consecutive consultations within 90 days; and (3) HbA1c levels ≥7%, or ≥7.5%, for patients aged ≥65 years at both consultations. Treatment intensification was defined as an addition or increased dose or switch in antidiabetic medications, inclusive of insulin, at the second consultation. Moreover, factors associated with treatment intensification were assessed.
Results: Of the 5,683 patients, 1,130 (19.9%) received intensified treatment at the second consultation. Intensification occurred more frequently with higher HbA1c levels or worsening HbA1c trends. However, treatments were not intensified in approximately 50% of the patients, with HbA1c levels >8% or a worsening of >1%. Predictive factors included the HbA1c levels at the second consultation, changes in the HbA1c levels between the first and second consultations, the number of oral hypoglycemic medications, and the use of sulfonylureas or glinides.
Conclusions: Physicians should consider HbA1c trends to guide treatment intensification when HbA1c levels exceed target thresholds. Clinical inertia remains an important issue in diabetes management.
Keywords: HbA1c trend; clinical inertia; type 2 diabetes.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
-
- International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas, 10th edn. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2021. https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth‐edition/.
-
- UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood‐glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998; 352: 837–853.
-
- Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): Prospective observational study. BMJ 2000; 321: 405–412.
-
- Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus: A randomized prospective 6‐year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995; 28: 103–117.
-
- Carls G, Huynh J, Tuttle E, et al. Achievement of glycated hemoglobin goals in the US remains unchanged through 2014. Diabetes Ther 2017; 8: 863–873.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
