Assessment of the Association Between Lung POCUS Findings During Preoperative Assessment and Cardiopulmonary Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Pilot Study Protocol
- PMID: 41322170
- PMCID: PMC12658584
- DOI: 10.24908/pocusj.v10i02.18912
Assessment of the Association Between Lung POCUS Findings During Preoperative Assessment and Cardiopulmonary Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Pilot Study Protocol
Abstract
Abdominal surgeries make up a significant portion of all surgical procedures performed worldwide. Despite advances in surgical techniques, there is significant morbidity and mortality associated with abdominal surgeries. Cardiopulmonary complications in the postoperative period play an important part in the elevated risk associated with these surgeries. Preoperative medical assessments have therefore become the standard of care to evaluate the risk of surgery, optimize a patient's medical conditions, and mitigate the perioperative risk. While there has been increasing utilization of lung point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in the immediate preoperative setting, the use of lung POCUS at the preoperative medical assessment clinic visit has not been studied. While using risk stratification tools is common in current practice, the role of adjunctive office-based techniques like lung POCUS have not been studied in this setting. We conducted an observational prospective pilot study to evaluate the association of lung POCUS findings in the preoperative visit on the risk of adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes in the 30-day postoperative period after major abdominal surgery. A standardized scoring system called integrated lung ultrasound score (iLUS) is used for objective assessment. Our study attempted to determine whether the addition of lung POCUS can be used to better stratify the risk for postoperative complications.
Keywords: Lung POCUS; Noncardiac surgery; Peri-operative; Point of care ultrasound (POCUS).
Copyright (c) 2025 Leonidas Palaiodimos, Sriram Sunil Kumar, Perminder Gulani, Maisha Maliha, Adam Mylonakis, Lori Lemberg, Mindaugas Pranevicius, Robert T Faillace, Ilias I. Siembos, Benjamin Galen, Dimitrios Schizas.
Figures
References
-
- Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, Uribe-Leitz T, Fu R, Azad T, Chao TE, Berry WR, Gawande AA. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet 2015;385(Suppl 2):S11. - PubMed
-
- Patel AY, Eagle KA, Vaishnava P. Cardiac risk of noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66(19):2140–8. - PubMed
-
- Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, Anker S, Bøtker HE, Hert SD, Ford I, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Gorenek B, Heyndrickx GR, Hoeft A, Huber K, Iung B, Kjeldsen KP, Longrois D, Lüscher TF, Pierard L, Pocock S, Price S, Roffi M, Sirnes PA, Sousa-Uva M, Voudris V, Funck-Brentano C. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J 2014;35(35):2383–431. - PubMed
-
- Steiner CA, Karaca Z, Moore BJ, Imshaug MC, Pickens G. Surgeries in hospital-based ambulatory surgery and hospital inpatient settings. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, 2014. - PubMed
-
- Mullen MG, Michaels AD, Mehaffey JH, Guidry CA, Turrentine FE, Hedrick TL, Friel CM. Risk associated with complications and mortality after urgent surgery vs elective and emergency surgery: Implications for defining “quality” and reporting outcomes for urgent surgery. JAMA Surg 2017;152(8):768–74. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources