Implementation and early outcomes of Da Vinci SP® Robot-Assisted partial nephrectomy via supine anterior retroperitoneal access: Italian single centre experience
- PMID: 41322461
- PMCID: PMC12663807
- DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2025.0093
Implementation and early outcomes of Da Vinci SP® Robot-Assisted partial nephrectomy via supine anterior retroperitoneal access: Italian single centre experience
Abstract
Introduction: The da Vinci SP® Surgical System, approved by the FDA in 2018 for urological procedures and by the European Union in 2024, is now being adopted across Europe. This report presents the first Italian experience with single-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) using the SP system.
Material and methods: From May 8 and May 31, 2024, ten consecutive male patients underwent single-port RAPN via a Lower Anterior retroperitoneal Access (LAA) at a single institution. Perioperative and early postoperative variables were prospectively collected and analyzed.
Results: All 10 procedures were completed without conversion to multiport or open surgery. One case was converted to radical nephrectomy for oncologic reasons. Eight procedures were performed on the right kidney and 2 on the left. Median patient age was 72 years (IQR 64-72), median BMI was 28.0 kg/m2 (IQR 24.9-34), and median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5 (IQR 4-6). Sixty percent had an ASA score of 3. Median RENAL and PADUA scores were 8 (IQR 7-9) and 7 (IQR 7-8), respectively. Tumours were <4 cm. Median warm ischaemia time was 21.5 minutes (IQR 15.25-26.5), operative time was 120 minutes (IQR 100-180), and blood loss was 60 ml (IQR 50-80). Pre- and postoperative eGFR medians were 84.9 and 84.2, respectively. Patients were discharged on postoperative day one with a median pain score of 1.3/10. No major (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) complications occurred. One patient had a positive surgical margin.
Conclusions: Single-port RAPN with the da Vinci SP® system is safe and feasible, with promising short-term outcomes.
Keywords: SP® surgical system; partial nephrectomy; single-site surgery; supine anterior retroperitoneal access.
Copyright by Polish Urological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Grivas N, Kalampokis N, Larcher A, et al. , and J-ERUS/YAU Robotic Urology Working Group. Robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes. A systematic review. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019; 71: 113–120. - PubMed
-
- Francavilla S, Abern MR, Dobbs RW, et al. Single-Port robot assisted partial nephrectomy: initial experience and technique with the da Vinci Single-Port platform (IDEAL Phase 1). Minerva Urol. Nephrol. 2022; 74: 216–224. - PubMed
-
- Bradshaw AW, Autorino R, Simone G, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy vs minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for clinical T2a renal mass: a propensity score-matched comparison from the ROSULA (Robotic Surgery for Large Renal Mass) Collaborative Group. BJU Int. 2020; 126: 114–123. - PubMed
-
- Pandolfo SD, Aveta A, Perdonà S, et al. The evolving landscape of renal surgery for complex renal masses (CRM): implications for oncologic and functional outcomes. Mini-invasive Surg. 2025; 9: 1. 10.20517/2574-1225.2024.83. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous