Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec 1:12:e71148.
doi: 10.2196/71148.

Adolescent Voices in Action-Co-Designing Digital Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge Translation Interventions: Community-Based Participatory Action Project

Salima Meherali #  1 , Amyna Ismail Rehmani #  1 , Mariam Ahmad #  1
Affiliations

Adolescent Voices in Action-Co-Designing Digital Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge Translation Interventions: Community-Based Participatory Action Project

Salima Meherali et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: Adolescents need comprehensive education and resources to promote their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and make informed decisions about their SRH. However, many adolescents fail to secure an opportunity to learn accurate and reliable SRH information, as they face sociocultural barriers, fear of prejudice, and societal stigma. Information available on digital platforms may not always be evidence-based and can further spread misinformation. Digital knowledge translation interventions that provide evidence-based SRH information in North America are limited.

Objective: This study aimed to co-design a digital knowledge translation intervention, reflective of adolescents' voices, to provide evidence-based, accessible, and accurate SRH resources.

Methods: We conducted a large multisite project across 3 cities in Canada. Using a community-based participatory approach and principles of human-centered design, we established adolescent advisory groups (AAGs) to actively engage them in the design, development, and implementation of the intervention.

Results: A total of 26 participants were recruited from Edmonton, Vancouver, and Toronto to be part of the advisory groups. AAG members participated in design-thinking sessions to brainstorm ideas for website design, identify informational needs for content development, provide iterative feedback on the design of the intervention, and suggest strategies to improve engagement and interaction. With their input, 6 priority areas were identified to develop SRH resources (ie, puberty, menstruation, sexually transmitted infections, healthy relationships, sexual assault, and contraception). Their feedback informed the design's language, visual appeal, and engagement factors. To promote meaningful engagement of AAGs at each step, we used strategies such as gamification activities, group discussions, and flexible scheduling, resulting in high retention and ownership of the process among AAG members.

Conclusions: Co-designing with adolescents strengthened the intervention's cultural relevance, youth-friendliness, and credibility. Our process emphasizes the significance of involving adolescents in co-designing SRH interventions, which results in more meaningful, long-term, and youth-friendly solutions.

Keywords: co-design; digital interventions; knowledge translation; sexual and reproductive health; youth-friendly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stages of the project. AAG: adolescent advisory group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of youth-centered sexual and reproductive health content developed for the Partnership to Empower Adolescent Engagement in Research platform.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Landing page of the Partnership to Empower Adolescent Engagement in Research digital platform.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adolescent health. World Health Organization. 2019. [2025-10-18]. https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health#tab=tab_1 .
    1. Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH) Youth-centred digital health interventions: a framework for planning, developing and implementing solutions with and for young people. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020.
    1. Salam RA, Faqqah A, Sajjad N, Lassi ZS, Das JK, Kaufman M, Bhutta ZA. Improving adolescent sexual and reproductive health: A systematic review of potential interventions. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(4S):S11–S28. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.05.022. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1054-139X(16)30168-9 S1054-139X(16)30168-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meherali S, Louie-Poon S, Idrees S, Kauser S, Scott S, Salami B, Valliantos H, Meherali KM, Patel K, Suthar P, Akbarzada Z, Marcus I, Khangura M, Mangat A. Understanding the sexual and reproductive health needs of immigrant adolescents in Canada: a qualitative study. Front Reprod Health. 2022;4:940979. doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.940979. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/36303669 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feroz A, Abrejo F, Ali SA, Nuruddin R, Saleem S. Using mobile phones to improve young people's sexual and reproductive health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol to identify barriers, facilitators and reported interventions. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1033-5. https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s136... 10.1186/s13643-019-1033-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources