Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec 3;17(1):63.
doi: 10.1038/s41419-025-08227-2.

Super-enhancers mediates SLC7A11 via FOXA1 to regulate disulfidptosis in prostate cancer

Affiliations

Super-enhancers mediates SLC7A11 via FOXA1 to regulate disulfidptosis in prostate cancer

Zhen Kang et al. Cell Death Dis. .

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a major therapeutic challenge due to aberrant androgen receptor signaling and a remodeled tumor microenvironment. Disulfidptosis, a recently identified form of cell death characterized by cytoskeletal collapse under conditions of glucose deprivation and elevated SLC7A11 expression, presents a potential novel avenue for intervention. In this study, we integrated TCGA and GEO data and employed machine learning techniques to identify disulfidptosis-related genes in prostate cancer. Functional analyses using SLC7A11-overexpressing and knockout cell lines demonstrated that SLC7A11 promotes cellular proliferation, migration, and invasion, while its overexpression under glucose-starved conditions triggers disulfidptosis, also inducible pharmacologically using the glucose uptake inhibitor BAY-876. Through CUT&Tag, ChIP-seq, and luciferase assays, we identified FOXA1 as a key transcriptional regulator of SLC7A11, driven by a super-enhancer located at chr14:37583488-37589585. CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of this super-enhancer reduced FOXA1 and SLC7A11 expression, thereby protecting cells from disulfidptosis. These findings highlight the critical role of the SE/FOXA1/SLC7A11 regulatory axis in driving both disulfidptosis and tumor progression, suggesting that targeting this pathway, particularly in glucose-deprived tumor environments, may offer promising therapeutic strategies for PCa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: This study was conducted in strict accordance with the relevant institutional guidelines and regulations of Fujian Medical University and the national guidelines and regulations of China. All animal experiments were approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Fujian Medical University (Approval No. IACUC FJMU 2022-0617). Throughout the experimental procedures, all animals were housed and cared for in accordance with the institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals, with efforts made to minimize pain and discomfort.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Analysis of biomarkers in prostate cancer.
A Concordance index (C-index) values of multiple machine learning models across different datasets. B Differential expression of ferroptosis-related genes between prostate cancer tissues and normal samples. CF Kaplan–Meier curves comparing progression-free survival between high and low expression groups of RPN1, OXSM, NDUFA11, and SLC7A11. G Protein–protein interaction network of 15 key ferroptosis-related proteins. H Bubble plot of KEGG pathway enrichment for the selected gene set. I Chromosomal locations of ferroptosis-related genes in the human genome. J Correlation network of ferroptosis-related genes before and after machine learning selection; edges represent correlations between risk and protective factors, with color and thickness indicating correlation strength. K UMAP dimensionality reduction analysis of the GSE141445 dataset showing spatial clustering of different tumor cell subtypes. LO Expression patterns of RPN1, OXSM, NDUFA11, and SLC7A11 across various tumor cell clusters. P Immunohistochemical staining of SLC7A11 in benign prostate (BP) tissues and prostate cancer tissues with different Gleason scores (<7, =7, >7). Q Quantitative analysis of SLC7A11-positive areas in immunohistochemistry; higher Gleason scores correlate with significantly increased SLC7A11 expression. RT Expression levels of SLC7A11 in different prostate cell lines detected by qRT-PCR and Western blot assays.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Effects of SLC7A11 on prostate cancer cell viability.
A Western blot showing SLC7A11 expression in different treatment groups. BF Wound healing and Transwell assays showing enhanced migration/invasion in SLC7A11-overexpressing (OE) cells and reduced abilities in knockout cells (sgRNA#1, sgRNA#2). G Tumor morphology after subcutaneous injection of DU145 cells (OE, NC, sgRNA#1, sgRNA#2) in nude mice. H Tumor weight comparison. I Tumor growth curves. J Ki67 immunohistochemistry in DU145 tumors. K Tumor morphology after PC-3 cell injection (OE, NC, sgRNA#1, sgRNA#2). L Tumor weight comparison. M Tumor growth curves for PC-3 xenografts. N Ki67 immunohistochemistry in PC-3 tumors. O Annexin V/7-AAD flow cytometry plots of PC-3 and DU145 cells under glucose-sufficient (+Glucose) and glucose-deprived (−Glucose) conditions. PS Apoptosis rate statistics for PC-3 and DU145 cells. T F-actin staining in DU145 and PC-3 cells under +Glucose and −Glucose conditions.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Regulatory effects of iBET-151 on prostate cancer cells.
A, B IC50 values of iBET-151 in PC-3 and DU145 cells. C, D IC50 values of JQ-1 in PC-3 and DU145 cells. E Flow cytometry analysis of apoptosis in PC-3 and DU145 cells treated with increasing concentrations of iBET-151 and JQ-1. F, G Quantification of apoptotic cells in PC-3 and DU145 following treatment. H Effects of iBET-151 and JQ-1 on colony formation in PC-3 and DU145 cells. I, J Quantification of colony numbers in treated and control groups. K Co-expression analysis of SLC7A11 and 10 predicted transcription factors in prostate tissue, based on TCGA and GTEx transcriptomic datasets. L Spatial transcriptomic analysis showing FOXA1 and SLC7A11 expression patterns in prostate cancer tissues. M Spatial transcriptomic profiles of FOXA1 and SLC7A11 in normal prostate tissues. NV Changes in FOXA1 protein and mRNA levels in PC-3 and DU145 cells treated with iBET-151 (300 μM and 150 μM) and JQ-1 (1 μM and 0.5 μM), as assessed by Western blot and qPCR.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Identification of super-enhancer target genes.
AE Secondary analysis of ChIP-seq data from the ENCODE public database showing super-enhancer (SE) target genes across various prostate cell lines. FK Super-enhancer target genes identified in DU145, PC-3, and RWPE-1 cell lines based on CUT&Tag experimental data. LO Changes in SE-associated genes in PC-3 and DU145 cells following iBET-151 treatment. P Overlap of SE target genes identified by CUT&Tag and ChIP-seq analyses; FOXA1 and IER2 were the only genes consistently identified. Q SE enrichment surrounding the FOXA1 locus across different cell lines based on ENCODE ChIP-seq data. R CUT&Tag sequencing results showing SE enrichment at the FOXA1 downstream region; genomic locations and sequences targeted by SE-sgRNA constructs. SU In DU145 cells, transfection with SE-sgRNA-1, SE-sgRNA-2, or SE-sgRNA-3 significantly reduced FOXA1 mRNA and protein expression levels. VX In PC-3 cells, transfection with SE-sgRNA-1, SE-sgRNA-2, or SE-sgRNA-3 also led to marked downregulation of FOXA1 transcription and protein expression.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Interaction between FOXA1 and the SLC7A11 promoter and its role in gene regulation.
A Predicted binding sites of FOXA1 on the SLC7A11 promoter based on AlphaFold-3 modeling. B Molecular docking simulation illustrating the interaction between FOXA1 protein and the SLC7A11 promoter region. C Dual-luciferase reporter assays show that FOXA1 enhances SLC7A11 promoter activity, while mutation of the binding sites disrupts this regulatory effect. D CUT&Tag analysis reveals DNA amplification bands in the FOXA1 immunoprecipitated (IP) group, indicating specific enrichment. E qPCR analysis confirms significant enrichment of the SLC7A11 promoter region in the FOXA1-IP group compared to controls. FJ In PC-3 cells, sequential disruption of the super-enhancer (SE) or promoter region significantly reduces FOXA1 and SLC7A11 expression. KO In DU145 cells, similar SE and promoter targeting also leads to a marked downregulation of FOXA1 and SLC7A11, demonstrating consistent regulatory effects.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Effects of SLC7A11 on cellular metabolism.
A, B Cysteine level in PC-3 and DU145 cells with varying SLC7A11 expression levels. C, D NADP⁺/NADPH ratio in SLC7A11-overexpressing (OE) cells under glucose-deprived conditions (−Glc) at different time points. E Reducing and non-reducing Western blot analysis showing the migration patterns of cytoskeletal proteins in SLC7A11-OE cells under different culture conditions. FH Flow cytometry analysis of apoptosis in DU145-OE and PC-3-OE cells under glucose and/or cystine deprivation. I, J BAY-876 significantly inhibits glucose uptake in DU145 and PC-3 cells. K, L BAY-876 treatment leads to increased NADPH consumption, as reflected by elevated NADP⁺/NADPH ratios in DU145 and PC-3 cells. MO In vivo, BAY-876 treatment results in significantly reduced tumor volume, weight, and growth rate in DU145-OE xenografts compared to DU145-NC controls. P Immunohistochemistry reveals a marked reduction in Ki67-positive area in DU145-OE tumors compared to DU145-NC. QS BAY-876 also significantly suppresses tumor volume, weight, and growth rate in PC-3-OE xenografts relative to PC-3-NC controls. T Immunohistochemical staining indicates decreased Ki67 expression in PC-3-OE tumors compared to PC-3-NC tumors.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Effects of FOXA1-associated super-enhancers on metabolic regulation in PC-3 and DU145 prostate cancer cells.
AC Changes in FOXA1 and SLC7A11 expression following FOXA1-SEs deletion in PC-3 and DU145 cells. D, E Impact of SE-sgRNA-mediated FOXA1-SEs deletion on BAY-876 sensitivity in PC-3 and DU145 cells. F, G Effects of SE-sgRNA on cysteine level in PC-3 and DU145 cells. H, I Effects of SE-sgRNA on NADP⁺/NADPH ratios in PC-3 and DU145 cells (1 µM). J, K SE-sgRNA-mediated alterations in intracellular GSH levels in PC-3 and DU145 cells. L F-actin and DAPI staining showing FOXA1-SEs influence on cytoskeletal morphology under glucose deprivation. M, N Apoptosis rates in PC-3 and DU145 cells under different treatments, including SE-sgRNA and various regulated cell death inhibitors.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
The molecular regulatory mechanism of SEs-FOXA1-SLC7A11 in disulfidptosis (By Figdraw).

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–63. - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. - PubMed
    1. Huang Y, Jiang X, Liang X, Jiang G. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of castration resistant prostate cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;15:6063–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cha HR, Lee JH, Ponnazhagan S. Revisiting immunotherapy: a focus on prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2020;80:1615–23. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu Y, Lu S, Wu LL, Yang L, Yang L, Wang J. The diversified role of mitochondria in ferroptosis in cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:519. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources