Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray and whole exome sequencing in evaluating genetic causes for pregnancy loss using products of conception specimens
- PMID: 41331780
- DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2025-0240
Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray and whole exome sequencing in evaluating genetic causes for pregnancy loss using products of conception specimens
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the genetic causes of miscarriage by analyzing products of conception (POC).
Methods: Chromosomal microarray (CMA) using the Affymetrix Cytoscan HD array was performed in 172 POC specimens from women experiencing spontaneous miscarriage before 20 weeks of gestation to detect aneuploidies, copy number variants (CNVs), and loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Whole exome sequencing (WES) with Roche KAPA HyperExome V2 probes was used for cases where CMA results were normal.
Results: Common clinical indications included recurrent pregnancy loss, first-time miscarriage, absence of cardiac activity, intrauterine death, and fetal growth restriction (FGR), making up 72.55 % of cases. CMA identified chromosomal abnormalities in 38.37 % of samples, with numerical anomalies in 16.86 % and structural anomalies in 21.51 %. Turner syndrome (5.8 %) and various trisomies (5.8 %) were frequent numerical anomalies. Mosaicism and LOH were observed in 11.04 and 2.91 % of cases. WES detected pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in 21 genes (e.g., KCNQ1, KCNE1, COL1A2, ROBO1) in 18 cases, adding a 10.46 % diagnostic yield. K-means clustering grouped 17 of these genes into three pathways: chondrocyte differentiation, fibrin clot formation, and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
Conclusions: Combining CMA and WES provides a diagnostic yield of 48.83 %, offering a powerful approach to uncover genetic causes of pregnancy loss and guide clinical care.
Keywords: chromosomal microarray; miscarriages; products of conception; whole exome sequencing.
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
References
-
- Quenby, S, Gallos, ID, Dhillon-Smith, RK, Podesek, M, Stephenson, MD, Fisher, J, et al.. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet 2021;397:1658–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6 . - DOI
-
- Matuszewska, KE, Bukowska-Olech, E, Piechota, M, Staniek-Łacna, K, Drews, K, Więckowska, B, et al.. From chromosomal aberrations to mutations in individual genes – the significance of genetic studies of chorions after miscarriage in the search for causes of miscarriages. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2024;37:2364249. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2364249 . - DOI
-
- Magnus, MC, Wilcox, AJ, Morken, NH, Weinberg, CR, Håberg, SE. Role of maternal age and pregnancy history in risk of miscarriage: prospective register based study. BMJ 2019;364:l869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l869 . - DOI
-
- du Fossé, NA, van der Hoorn, MP, van Lith, JMM, le Cessie, S, Lashley, EELO. Advanced paternal age is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2020;26:650–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa010 . - DOI
-
- Dhillon, RK, Hillman, SC, Morris, RK, McMullan, D, Williams, D, Coomarasamy, A, et al.. Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2014;121:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12382 . - DOI