Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec 3:e2523373.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.23373. Online ahead of print.

Intraoperative Driving Pressure-Guided High PEEP vs Standard Low PEEP for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Collaborators, Affiliations

Intraoperative Driving Pressure-Guided High PEEP vs Standard Low PEEP for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Writing and Steering Committees for the DESIGNATION–Investigators et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: The effect of individualized high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers, targeting a low driving pressure, on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery is uncertain.

Objective: To compare driving pressure-guided high PEEP and recruitment maneuvers with standard low PEEP without recruitment maneuvers with respect to postoperative pulmonary complications.

Design, setting, and participants: Randomized clinical trial of 1435 adults at increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications who were scheduled for open abdominal surgery. The trial was conducted at 29 sites in 5 countries across Europe from April 2019 to December 2024; final follow-up was in March 2025. Statistical analysis was conducted in May 2025.

Intervention: Patients were randomized to undergo intraoperative ventilation with driving pressure-guided high PEEP and recruitment maneuvers (n = 718) or to intraoperative ventilation with standard low PEEP (n = 717). All patients received low tidal volume ventilation.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary complications within the first 5 postoperative days, including severe respiratory failure, bronchospasm, suspected pulmonary infection, pulmonary infiltrates, aspiration pneumonitis, atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pleural effusion, cardiopulmonary edema, and pneumothorax. Among the 16 prespecified secondary outcomes, 4 concerned intraoperative complications, including hypotension (decrease in mean arterial pressure of >20% for >3 minutes) and desaturation (Spo2 <92% for >1 minute).

Results: Among 1468 adults, 1435 (98%) completed the trial (median [IQR] age, 66 [57-74] years; 52% female). In the primary analysis population, the primary outcome occurred in 142 of 718 patients (19.8%) in the driving pressure-guided high PEEP group compared with 125 of 717 patients (17.4%) in the low PEEP group (absolute difference, 2.5% [95% CI, -1.5% to 6.4%]; P = .23). The incidence of hypotension (382 [54.0%] vs 317 [45.0%]) and use of vasoactive agents (224 [32.0%] vs 130 [18.8%]) was higher in the high PEEP group; the incidence of intraoperative desaturation (6 [0.8%] vs 20 [2.8%]) was higher in the low PEEP group.

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients at increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications undergoing open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia, intraoperative ventilation with driving pressure-guided high PEEP and recruitment maneuvers, compared with a strategy with standard low PEEP, did not reduce postoperative pulmonary complications.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03884543.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Gama de Abreu reported receiving personal fees from Ambu outside the submitted work. Dr Hol reported receiving grants from ZonMw during the conduct of the study. Dr Hollmann reported receiving grants from ZonMw during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work; and serving as executive section editor of pharmacology for Anesthesia & Analgesia, section editor of anesthesiology for Journal of Clinical Medicine, and editor of Frontiers in Physiology. Dr van Meenen reported receiving grants from ZonMw and European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care during the conduct of the study. Dr Serpa Neto reported receiving personal fees from Hamilton Medical outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

References

    1. LAS VEGAS investigators . Epidemiology, practice of ventilation and outcome for patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: LAS VEGAS—an observational study in 29 countries. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(8):492-507. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000646 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, et al. ; PROVE Network investigators . Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(12):1007-1015. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70228-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mazo V, Sabaté S, Canet J, et al. Prospective external validation of a predictive score for postoperative pulmonary complications. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(2):219-231. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000334 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications, early mortality, and hospital stay following noncardiothoracic surgery: a multicenter study by the Perioperative Research Network Investigators. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(2):157-166. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4065 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleisher LA, Linde-Zwirble WT. Incidence, outcome, and attributable resource use associated with pulmonary and cardiac complications after major small and large bowel procedures. Perioper Med (Lond). 2014;3:7. doi: 10.1186/2047-0525-3-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data