Efficacy and safety of tenapanor in the management of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 41342330
- DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000003107
Efficacy and safety of tenapanor in the management of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) is a common gastrointestinal disorder that significantly impacts quality of life. Tenapanor, a sodium/hydrogen exchanger inhibitor, shows promise in managing IBS-C. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenapanor 50 mg compared with placebo.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search was conducted on 7 October 2024 across PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on adult IBS-C patients aged 18-75. Quality assessment was performed using the risk of bias 2 tool. Primary outcomes included responder rates for abdominal symptoms (pain, discomfort, bloating, cramping, fullness) and complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM). Secondary outcomes comprised treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and those leading to treatment discontinuation. Data analysis was conducted using R software.
Results: Three RCTs involving 1378 patients were included. Tenapanor significantly improved symptoms versus placebo, including bloating [relative risk (RR) = 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.51], cramping (RR = 1.27; CI, 1.13-1.44), discomfort (RR = 1.37; CI, 1.21-1.56), fullness (RR = 1.37; CI, 1.20-1.58), pain (RR = 1.37; CI, 1.17-1.49), and CSBM (RR = 1.54; CI, 1.24-1.91). However, tenapanor was associated with higher rates of treatment-related AEs (RR = 2.3; CI, 1.72-3.06) and AEs leading to discontinuation (RR = 9.08; CI, 3.63-22.71).
Conclusion: Tenapanor is effective in improving IBS-C symptoms but has a higher incidence of treatment-related AEs. Further studies are needed to evaluate its long-term safety.
Keywords: constipation; irritable bowel syndrome; tenapanor.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Palsson OS, Whitehead W, Törnblom H, Sperber AD, Simren M. Prevalence of Rome IV functional bowel disorders among adults in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:1262–1273.e3.
-
- Chey WD, Kurlander J, Eswaran S. Irritable bowel syndrome: a clinical review. American Medical Association 2015; 313:949–958. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.0954. - DOI
-
- Lacy BE, Pimentel M, Brenner DM, Chey WD, Keefer LA, Long MD, Moshiree B. ACG clinical guideline: management of irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:17–44.
-
- Lacy BE, et al. Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2016; 150:1393–1407.e5.
-
- Ford AC, Lacy BE, Talley NJ. Irritable bowel syndrome. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:2566–2578.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
