Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Jan 20;63(1):tjaf162.
doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaf162.

Spatiotemporal variation in abundance and genetic structure in an urban-rural landscape: Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1894) (Diptera: Culicidae) in Wake County, NC

Affiliations

Spatiotemporal variation in abundance and genetic structure in an urban-rural landscape: Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1894) (Diptera: Culicidae) in Wake County, NC

Emily M X Reed et al. J Med Entomol. .

Abstract

Since its invasion of the United States in the 1980s, Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1894) has become a major pest and a significant public health threat in the Southeastern United States. Despite its importance, we know little about its population genetics at fine spatial scales that correspond to the level of management units. To remedy this lack of information, we analyzed Ae. albopictus spatial variation in mosquito abundance and genetic structure in an urban-rural landscape over 2 years (2016 and 2018) in Wake County, NC, United States. We used a reduced representation sequencing method to generate between 1,100 and 30,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms for population genetic analyses. We found spatial variation in both the abundance and genetic diversity, and significant differences in genetic divergence among sites that varied between the 2 years. The year-to-year variation in the population genetic patterns at the within-county scale suggests a dynamic system that requires extensive geographic, temporal, and genomic sampling to resolve.

Keywords: Aedes albopictus; ddRAD seq; mosquitoes; population genetics; urban landscapes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Delineation of zones for Wake County, which act as proxies for the overall pattern of urbanization. In order from most to least urbanized: the Inner Zone is defined as inside the Interstate 440 beltline, the Outer Zone is between the Interstate 540 beltline and I-440, and the Outside Zone is the remainder of the county.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Wake County sampling locations. (A) sites and site names from 2016; all have genetic data for a portion of collected individuals (note we limit the number of individuals per ovitrap). There are four sites in the Inner Zone, five in the Outer Zone, and six in the Outside Zone. (B) Sampled sites from 2018; points overlaid with asterisks are sites that also have genetic data for mosquitoes. The number of sites in each Zone (and number of sites used in population genetic analyses in parentheses) are as follows. Inner Zone: six (four); Outer Zone: 18 (14); Outside Zone: 37 (24).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Average A. albopictus abundance in Wake County. (A) Average egg abundance per week in 2016, larger points indicate higher average egg abundance. Aedes albopictus eggs were found at all sampling locations, and average count ranged from 10.75 to −213.59 per ovitrap per week. There were no significant differences in mean abundance between Zones. Sites in the Inner Zone are shown in red, those in the Outer Zone in gray, and in the Outside Zone, blue. (B) Average adult abundance per light-hour in Wake County 2018, at 61 locations. Larger points indicate higher average adult abundance. Aedes albopictus adults were found at 59/61 sites, and average abundance ranged from 0.02 to 10.31 adults per light-hour. There were no significant differences in mean abundance between zones. Sites in the Inner Zone are shown in red, those in the Outer Zone in gray, and in the Outside Zone in blue.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
DAPC scatterplots for all sample sites. (A) 15 sites sampled in Wake County 2016, with the first two discriminant functions (DAs) on the x and y axes. Cross-validation retained 50 principal components, which produced a correct assignment rate of 0.807. (B) for the 42 sites sampled in Wake County 2018, with the first two discriminant functions (DAs) on the x and y axes. Cross-validation retained 60 principal components, which produced a correct assignment rate of 0.62.

References

    1. Ariori C, Aiello-Lammens ME, Silander JA. 2017. Plant invasion along an urban-to-rural gradient in northeast Connecticut. J. Urb. Ecol. 3:1–13. 10.1093/jue/jux008 - DOI
    1. Barker CM, Paulson SL, Cantrell S, et al. 2003. Habitat preferences and phenology of Ochlerotatus triseriatus and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in southwestern Virginia. J. Med. Entomol. 40:403–410. no - PubMed
    1. Baudouin G, Bech N, Bagnères A-G, et al. 2018. Spatial and genetic distribution of a North American termite, Reticulitermes flavipes, across the landscape of Paris. Urb. Ecosyst. 21:751–764. 10.1007/s11252-018-0747-9 - DOI
    1. Benedict MQ, Levine RS, Hawley WA, et al. 2007. Spread of the tiger: global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 7:76–85. 10.1089/vbz.2006.0562 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blair RB, Johnson EM. 2008. Suburban habitats and their role for birds in the urban–rural habitat network: points of local invasion and extinction? Landscape Ecol. 23:1157–1169. 10.1007/s10980-008-9267-y - DOI

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources