Soil property controls on plasticiser, antioxidant and UV absorber additive degradation across a global soil gradient
- PMID: 41345814
- PMCID: PMC12811332
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-025-37152-2
Soil property controls on plasticiser, antioxidant and UV absorber additive degradation across a global soil gradient
Abstract
Additives in agricultural plastics can leach into the surrounding soil during use or improper disposal. Their subsequent degradation rates directly regulate whether they persist and accumulate to levels with ecotoxicological effects or are rendered benign. However, which soil properties primarily regulate the degradation of additives remains unclear (e.g. soil carbon, pH, available nutrients, microbial biomass and community structure). We assessed the degradation of the common plastic additives with different functionalities (DEHP (di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; plasticiser), 2-hydroxy-4-n-octyloxybenzophenone (benzophenone-12; BP12; UV stabiliser) and AO168 (tris(2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl) phosphite; antioxidant)) in soils under controlled moisture and temperature conditions over 21 days across contrasting agricultural soils from six countries across a global transect (Australia, Brazil, Egypt, India, Vietnam and the UK). DEHP followed zero-order degradation kinetics, with negligible degradation in soils with low microbial biomass. BP12 degraded fastest via first-order degradation kinetics via ether cleavage and hydroxyl loss. The degradation of DEHP and BP12 was correlated with soil microbial biomass and nitrate concentration. BP12 degradation products detected included benzophenone and benzoic acid. DEHP is degraded via β-oxidation of alkyl groups to dibutyl phthalate and diethyl phthalate and through ester hydrolysis to phthalic acid. AO168 degraded via abiotic oxidation and phosphate ester hydrolysis to 2,4-di-tert-butyl-phenol, and degradation was not well correlated with any measured soil variable. Overall, these results show that the components of additive mixtures leached into soils will degrade at different rates due to varying mechanisms and controls exerted by the soil microbial biomass. Plastic additives have differing potentials to persist in agricultural soils globally, with some likely to accumulate to levels that may impact soil function and pose an ecotoxicological threat to soil biota.
Keywords: Abiotic degradation; Antioxidant; Microbial turnover; Plasticiser; UV absorber.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: This is not applicable. Consent to participate: This is not applicable. Consent for publication: This is not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Badia-Fabregat M, Caminal G, Vicent T, Blanquez P, Gago-Ferrero P, Olivares A, Piña B, Díaz-Cruz MS, Barceló D (2012) UV filters biodegradation by fungi, metabolites identification and biological activity assessment, pp 215–240. 10.1007/698_2012_157
-
- Billings A, Jones KC, Pereira MG, Spurgeon DJ (2021) Plasticisers in the terrestrial environment: sources, occurrence and fate. Environ Chem 18:111–130. 10.1071/EN21033 - DOI
-
- Carstensen L, Beil S, Schwab E, Banke S, Börnick H, Stolte S (2023) Primary and ultimate degradation of benzophenone-type UV filters under different environmental conditions and the underlying structure-biodegradability relationships. J Hazard Mater 446:130634. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130634 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
