Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 19:15:1628318.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1628318. eCollection 2025.

Dosimetric parameter determination of a carbon-nanotube based miniature x-ray tube for HDR brachytherapy

Affiliations

Dosimetric parameter determination of a carbon-nanotube based miniature x-ray tube for HDR brachytherapy

Sang-Won Kang et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to determine key dosimetric parameters of a vacuum-sealed miniature X-ray tube (mXT) equipped with a carbon nanotube field emitter for application in HDR brachytherapy.

Methods: Dosimetric parameters, including dose-rate constant, radial dose, and anisotropic function, were assessed 1 cm below the mXT employing EBT3 film and a custom-manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) phantom. The dose-rate constant and radial-dose functions were measured following the standard polar angles and radial distances prescribed by the AAPM TG-43 protocol. However, anisotropic function measurements were selectively conducted due to the directional dependence of Gafchromic EBT3 film when placed coplanar to the X-ray source. To minimize this effect, films were positioned 1 cm below the mXT, which restricted the measurable angular range. These parameters were also computed in both a virtual ABS and water phantom using the MCNP6.1 code. Correlation factors for different materials were obtained to adjust measured parameters in the ABS phantom to those in water, based on the calculated depth-dose curve. The dosimetric parameters were then determined by comparing the measured and calculated values.

Results: The dose-rate constant was determined to be 1344.14 cGy·h-1·μA-1. Radial-dose functions were 0.49, 0.33, 0.22, and 0.15 at radial distances of 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 cm, respectively. The difference between measured and calculated radial-dose functions in water remained within 0.10, averaging 0.05. Anisotropic functions exhibited an increase with the radial distance, approaching 0° angle. Azimuthal angular dependence was deemed acceptable.

Conclusion: This study successfully acquired both measured and calculated parameters for the newly developed mXT. The findings affirm that the dosimetric parameters of the mXT are within acceptable limits for clinical HDR brachytherapy applications.

Keywords: AAPM task group (TG) 43; HDR brachytherapy; dosimetric parameters; film dosimetry; vacuum-sealed miniature X-ray tube (mXT).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Schematic of a vacuum-sealed miniature X-ray tube (mXT) based on a novel carbon nanotube field emitter and (b) manufactured mXT.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Coordinate system for dosimetric parameters of the mXT, such as the dose-rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Mimic diagram of the completed quality assurance phantom for the mXT, (b) source inserter slabs, and (c) XR multidetector inserter.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Net optical-density (netOD) curve acquired as a function of dose from a 6-MV beam for EBT3 film calibration.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Calculated depth–dose curves by MCNP6.1 in virtual water and ABS phantom. The correlation factor defined as the ratio of the calculated depth–dose curve between both materials with respect to the radial distance.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Angular and radial dose distributions normalized to 100% at the reference position of 90° and 1 cm from the source. Regions with relative doses below 5% are magnified for clarity. (a) shows relative doses measured in the ABS phantom using EBT3 film, while (b, c) present relative doses calculated via Monte Carlo simulations in the ABS and water phantoms, respectively.

References

    1. Nag S, Erickson B, Thomadsen B, Orton C, Demanes JD, Petereit D. The American brachytherapy society recommendations for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radia Oncol Biol Phys. (2000) 48:201–11. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00497-1, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson D. High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy quality assurance: A practical guide. BioMed Imaging Intervention J. (2006) 2:1–7. doi: 10.2349/biij.2.2.e34, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mobit PN, Packianathan S, He R, Yang CC. Comparison of Axxent-Xoft, 192Ir and 60Co high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources for image-guided brachytherapy treatment planning for cervical cancer. Br J Radiol. (2015) 88:20150010. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150010, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richter J, Baier K, Flentje M. Comparison of 60Cobalt and 192Iridium sources in high dose rate afterloading brachytherapy. Strahlenther Onkol. (2008) 184:187–92. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1684-y, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rivard MJ, Davis SD, DeWerd LA, Rusch TW, Axelrod S. Calculated and measured brachytherapy dosimetry parameters in water for the Xoft Axxent X-Ray source: an electronic brachytherapy source. Med Phys. (2006) 33:4020–32. doi: 10.1118/1.2357021, PMID: - DOI - PubMed