Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 13.
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001988. Online ahead of print.

Biomechanical Study of Finite Element Method on Novel Composite Anterior Cervical Spine Fixation Techniques

Affiliations

Biomechanical Study of Finite Element Method on Novel Composite Anterior Cervical Spine Fixation Techniques

Zhipeng Hou et al. Clin Spine Surg. .

Abstract

Study design: This study was to compare the biomechanical properties of 4 internal fixation methods on the lower cervical injury model by finite element method.

Objective: Using the finite element method to study the biomechanical characteristics of the novel composite anterior cervical spine fixation technique-combining anterior transpedicular screw fixation with a zero-track internal fixation.

Summary of background info: Several studies have demonstrated lower cervical 3-column injury is not effective treated by anterior cervical surgery. To the best of our knowledge, few studies has examined the effectiveness of enhanced anterior cervical surgery alone.

Methods: CT data of a healthy 28-year-old male adult were selected to create finite element models of a 3-column injury model of the lower cervical spine. Four internal fixation methods were applied to the lower cervical spine injury model: anterior cervical locking plate model (group A), posterior transpedicular screw fixation model (group B), anterior+posterior transpedicular screw fixation model (group C), and the novel composite anterior cervical spine fixation model (group D). These models were subjected to 75 N axial force and 1.0 Nm to induce various movements. Comparing the range of motion (ROM), vertebral displacement, and stress distribution of the different models under various conditions.

Results: Compared with the normal model, in flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral bending, the overall intervertebral mobility of group D demonstrated less ROM, but a slightly larger than group C. In flexion, rotation, and lateral bending, the peak stresses for group D were less than group B. In flexion and extension, the vertebral displacements of C3-6 in group D showed less displacement, but a slightly larger than group C.

Conclusions: The biomechanical characteristics of the new composite anterior cervical fixation method are favorable.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Keywords: anterior transpedicular screw; cervical spine; finite elements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Aghayev K, Doulgeris JJ, Gonzalez-Blohm SA, et al. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014;29:21–25.
    1. Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, et al. Biomechanical effects of anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques on the stability of a multilevel cervical corpectomy construct: a finite element model analysis. Spine J. 2011;11:324–330.
    1. An HS, Al-Shihabi L, Kurd M. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:420–429.
    1. Li J, Zhao L, Liu W, et al. Anterior transpedicular screws in conjunction with plate fixation and fusion for the treatment of subaxial cervical spine diseases. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1681–1690.
    1. Koller H, Hempfing A, Acosta F, et al. Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Part I: Study on morphological feasibility, indications, and technical prerequisites. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:523–538.

LinkOut - more resources