Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec 6.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07663-8. Online ahead of print.

Exploring the feasibility of a 40-minute uptake time for long axial field of view [18F]FDG PET/CT tumour scan: an evidence-based single-center study

Affiliations

Exploring the feasibility of a 40-minute uptake time for long axial field of view [18F]FDG PET/CT tumour scan: an evidence-based single-center study

Yibo He et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. .

Abstract

Purpose: The EANM/SNMMI guidelines recommend an uptake time of 60 min for 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) in oncology imaging, with an acceptable range of 55 to 75 min. Over time, positron emission tomography (PET) technology has advanced significantly in terms of signal collection efficiency. This study aims to explore the feasibility of PET acquisition after a 40-minute uptake period following [18F]FDG administration in patients with tumours.

Methods: Forty-three oncological patients who underwent 60-min total-body dynamic [18F]FDG PET scan were retrospectively included as the exploration cohort. The raw data was reconstructed into 55 image frames to calculate and compare the lesion-to-background ratios (LBRs) of different image frames (GD57-60 served as the reference). The data from 40 to 52 min and 57-60 min were then reconstructed into static PET images (G40 - 43, G43 - 46, G46 - 49, G49 - 52, and G57 - 60). The differences in image quality (subjective image score, standardized uptake value [SUV], signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], and LBRs) and lesion-detection rate (histopathology served as reference) among groups were evaluated. In the validation cohort, 46 oncological patients who underwent a 20-min total-body PET/CT scan at 40 min after [18F]FDG injection were prospectively enrolled. The raw data were reconstructed using the same protocols with dynamic scan and briefly called: G40 - 43', G43 - 46', G46 - 49', G49 - 52', and G57 - 60', and the image quality and lesion detection rate among groups were assessed.

Results: The activity curves reveal that the average LBRs gradually increased with time, with no significant difference between GD45-48 and GD57-60 (all p ≥ 0.27). The static PET image quality in both cohorts was as good as the 57-min uptake imaging. In the exploration cohort, the SNRs of G57 - 60 were not better than the other groups. For all lesions, SUVmax, lesion-to-liver ratio (LLR), lesion-to-muscle ratio (LMR), and lesion-to-normal tissue ratio (LNR) showed no statistically significant differences between G49 - 52 and G57 - 60 (all p ≥ 0.06), with the exception of lesion-to-blood pool ratio (LBPR) (p < 0.05). The lesion-detection rate was 85.7% (48/56; 95% CI: 0.74-0.94) in all groups. In the validation cohort, G40 - 43' and G57 - 60' shared comparable background SNRs and the same lesion detection rate (94.0%, 63/67; 95% CI: 0.85-0.98).

Conclusion: Reducing the uptake time from 60 min to 40 min after [18F]FDG injection in oncology patients can still yield PET images with sufficient quality and lesion detectability to meet clinical requirements in total body PET/CT. Shortening the uptake time raised the efficiency of the uptake room, increased patient throughput, and enhanced patient comfort, without changing the scan protocol or compromising imaging quality.

Keywords: 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose; Positron emission tomography/Computed tomography; Time interval; Total body.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Hospital [approval number: B2023-161(2)] and performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent to publish: The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the studied data. Conflict of interest: Mike Sathekge is associate editor of the EJNMMI. Florent L. Besson, Akram Al-Ibraheem, Axel Rominger, Zhi Yang, and Hongcheng Shi are members of the editorial board of the EJNMMI. The authors declare no other conflict of interest.

References

    1. Dunet V, Pomoni A, Hottinger A, Nicod-Lalonde M, Prior JO. Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18(3):426–34. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrington SF, Kirkwood AA, Franceschetto A, Fulham MJ, Roberts TH, Almquist H, et al. PET-CT for staging and early response: results from the Response-Adapted therapy in advanced hodgkin lymphoma study. Blood. 2016;127(12):1531–8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zinzani PL, Tani M, Fanti S, Alinari L, Musuraca G, Marchi E, et al. Early positron emission tomography (PET) restaging: a predictive final response in hodgkin’s disease patients. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(8):1296–300. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):328–54. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. Quantitative FDG-PET Technical Committee. UPICT oncology FDG-PET CT protocol. http://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=FDG-PET_tech_ctte . Accessed 4 Aug 2024.

LinkOut - more resources