Exploring the feasibility of a 40-minute uptake time for long axial field of view [18F]FDG PET/CT tumour scan: an evidence-based single-center study
- PMID: 41350472
- DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07663-8
Exploring the feasibility of a 40-minute uptake time for long axial field of view [18F]FDG PET/CT tumour scan: an evidence-based single-center study
Abstract
Purpose: The EANM/SNMMI guidelines recommend an uptake time of 60 min for 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) in oncology imaging, with an acceptable range of 55 to 75 min. Over time, positron emission tomography (PET) technology has advanced significantly in terms of signal collection efficiency. This study aims to explore the feasibility of PET acquisition after a 40-minute uptake period following [18F]FDG administration in patients with tumours.
Methods: Forty-three oncological patients who underwent 60-min total-body dynamic [18F]FDG PET scan were retrospectively included as the exploration cohort. The raw data was reconstructed into 55 image frames to calculate and compare the lesion-to-background ratios (LBRs) of different image frames (GD57-60 served as the reference). The data from 40 to 52 min and 57-60 min were then reconstructed into static PET images (G40 - 43, G43 - 46, G46 - 49, G49 - 52, and G57 - 60). The differences in image quality (subjective image score, standardized uptake value [SUV], signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], and LBRs) and lesion-detection rate (histopathology served as reference) among groups were evaluated. In the validation cohort, 46 oncological patients who underwent a 20-min total-body PET/CT scan at 40 min after [18F]FDG injection were prospectively enrolled. The raw data were reconstructed using the same protocols with dynamic scan and briefly called: G40 - 43', G43 - 46', G46 - 49', G49 - 52', and G57 - 60', and the image quality and lesion detection rate among groups were assessed.
Results: The activity curves reveal that the average LBRs gradually increased with time, with no significant difference between GD45-48 and GD57-60 (all p ≥ 0.27). The static PET image quality in both cohorts was as good as the 57-min uptake imaging. In the exploration cohort, the SNRs of G57 - 60 were not better than the other groups. For all lesions, SUVmax, lesion-to-liver ratio (LLR), lesion-to-muscle ratio (LMR), and lesion-to-normal tissue ratio (LNR) showed no statistically significant differences between G49 - 52 and G57 - 60 (all p ≥ 0.06), with the exception of lesion-to-blood pool ratio (LBPR) (p < 0.05). The lesion-detection rate was 85.7% (48/56; 95% CI: 0.74-0.94) in all groups. In the validation cohort, G40 - 43' and G57 - 60' shared comparable background SNRs and the same lesion detection rate (94.0%, 63/67; 95% CI: 0.85-0.98).
Conclusion: Reducing the uptake time from 60 min to 40 min after [18F]FDG injection in oncology patients can still yield PET images with sufficient quality and lesion detectability to meet clinical requirements in total body PET/CT. Shortening the uptake time raised the efficiency of the uptake room, increased patient throughput, and enhanced patient comfort, without changing the scan protocol or compromising imaging quality.
Keywords: 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose; Positron emission tomography/Computed tomography; Time interval; Total body.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Hospital [approval number: B2023-161(2)] and performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent to publish: The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the studied data. Conflict of interest: Mike Sathekge is associate editor of the EJNMMI. Florent L. Besson, Akram Al-Ibraheem, Axel Rominger, Zhi Yang, and Hongcheng Shi are members of the editorial board of the EJNMMI. The authors declare no other conflict of interest.
References
-
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. Quantitative FDG-PET Technical Committee. UPICT oncology FDG-PET CT protocol. http://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=FDG-PET_tech_ctte . Accessed 4 Aug 2024.
Grants and funding
- 23SHS01200/the Innovative Medical Device Application Demonstration Program of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Economy and Informatization
- CEIEC-2022-ZM02-0219/the Key Program of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China
- YWP2022-007/the Chinese National Key Clinical Specialty Program
- 2024TGYY06/National High-End Medical Equipment Popularization and Application Program
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
