Mechanical properties analysis of the interspersed replacement of timber sleepers with bamboo-based composite sleepers on open bridge deck
- PMID: 41353413
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-28871-0
Mechanical properties analysis of the interspersed replacement of timber sleepers with bamboo-based composite sleepers on open bridge deck
Abstract
Due to the discrete deterioration characteristics of timber sleepers on open bridge deck, continuous replacement is difficult. New bamboo-based composite sleepers (BCSs) offer excellent performance at a low price, making them an ideal alternative to timber sleepers. Therefore, this study focuses on the mechanical properties and safety of the interspersed replacement of timber Sleepers with BCSs. A static model of the open deck track and a vehicle-track coupling dynamic model were established to precisely analyze the influence of 1 in 2, 1 in 3, and 1 in 4 interspersed replacement, as well as full replacement with BCSs on the force and deformation of the track structure and the dynamic characteristics of the vehicle-track system. After the interspersed replacement of timber sleepers with BCSs, the sleeper compression, sleeper vertical displacement, and gauge reduction were decreased; however, the sleeper bending moment, vehicle acceleration, wheel-rail force, and bridge deck acceleration were slightly increased. At the longitudinal beam support, the BCSs showed a negative bending moment, with compression at the bottom and tension at the top. The maximum tensile and compressive stresses were 4.87 MPa and 7.97 MPa, respectively, which are both below the allowable stress of the material-meeting the strength requirements for BCSs. Although the interspersed replacement of timber sleepers with BCSs leads to uneven track stiffness, the track deformation, stress distribution and dynamic response remain within acceptable limits. This research provides new ideas for track structure upgrades and maintenance strategies.
Keywords: Bamboo-based composite sleeper; Dynamic characteristics; Open bridge deck; Steel truss bridge; Timber sleeper.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Kaewunruen, S., Lopes, L. M. C. & Papaelias, M. P. Georisks in railway systems under climate uncertainties by different types of sleeper/crosstie materials. Lowland Technol. Int. 20, 77–86 (2018).
-
- Ferdous, W. et al. Composite railway sleepers - Recent developments, challenges and future prospects. Compos. Struct. 134, 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.058 (2015).
-
- Safari, F., Rezaie, M., Esmaeili, M. & Korayem, A. H. Application of waste materials for concrete and composite railway sleeper production: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F-Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 239 333–351 https://doi.org/10.1177/09544097251316710 (2025).
-
- Thompson, S., King, C., Rodwell, J., Rayburg, S. & Neave, M. Life Cycle Cost and Assessment of Alternative Railway Sleeper Materials. Sustainability https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148814 (2022).
-
- Salih, C. et al. Effect of bending and compressive modulus of elasticity on the behaviour of timber-alternative railway sleepers supported by ballast. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00597 (2021).
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
