Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov;29(Suppl 2):S95-S100.
doi: 10.5213/inj.2550294.147. Epub 2025 Nov 30.

Radiomics Reproducibility in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Based on PROSTATEx

Affiliations

Radiomics Reproducibility in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Based on PROSTATEx

Sumin Jung et al. Int Neurourol J. 2025 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to extract radiomics features from prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), evaluate their reproducibility, and determine whether machine learning (ML) models built on reproducible features can noninvasively diagnose prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods: We analyzed prostate MRI from 82 subjects (41 PCa and 41 controls) in the public PROSTATEx dataset. From T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, 215 features per sequence were extracted (T2WI 215; ADC 215; total 430). Reproducibility within each sequence was quantified after repeated segmentation using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 2-way random-effects, absolute-agreement model. Only shared features with ICC≥0.75 in both T2WI and ADC were retained. Selected features were normalized and combined via early fusion into a single input vector. Redundant features were eliminated by Pearson correlation analysis (|r|>0.9).

Results: Reproducible radiomics features (ICC≥0.75) were key contributors to model performance. Using these features, support vector machine, neural network, and logistic regression models achieved accuracies of 80%-84% and a maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 under 5-fold cross-validation. Principal component analysis yielded the most consistent results, whereas several nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods produced variable outcomes across classifiers.

Conclusion: Combining reproducible MRI radiomics features with dimensionality reduction and ML offers a robust noninvasive approach for PCa diagnosis. Emphasizing reproducibility enhances model performance and reliability, supporting potential clinical translation.

Keywords: Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasms; Radiomics; Reproducibility of results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Workflow of the radiomics-based prostate cancer classification pipeline. Steps include SERA feature extraction, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC≥0.75) filtering, Pearson correlation pruning (|r|>0.9), dimensionality reduction, classification, and nested 5-fold cross-validation (CV) with inner and outer loops. SERA, standardized environment for radiomics analysis; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; T2WI, T2-weighted imaging; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; VOI/ROI, volume of interest/region of interest; PCA, principal component analysis; KPCA, kernel PCA; LDA, linear discriminant analysis; LLE, locally linear embedding; AE, autoencoder; SVM, support vector machine; LR, logistic regression; NN, nearest neighbors; RF, random forest; k-NN, k-nearest neighbors; XGB, XGBoost; LGBM, LightGBM; CatB, CatBoost; AdaB, AdaBoost; DT, decision tree.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Prefiltering ICC distributions of radiomics features. (A) T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and (B) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, displayed as boxplots grouped by feature category. ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; GLCM, gray level co-occurrence matrix; GLRLM, gray level run length matrix; GLSZM, gray level size zone matrix; NGTDM, neighborhood gray tone difference matrix; GLDM, gray level dependence matrix.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Mean±standard deviation for accuracy by dimensionality reduction across different dimensionality reduction methods, including principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and kernel PCA. SVM, support vector machine.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Mean±standard deviation for the area under the curve by classifier (max 0.85): support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression, neural network, random forest, and CatBoost. AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

References

    1. Rodrigues A, Rodrigues N, Santinha J, Lisitskaya MV, Uysal A, Matos C, et al. Value of handcrafted and deep radiomic features towards training robust machine learning classifiers for prediction of prostate cancer disease aggressiveness. Sci Rep. 2023;13:6206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pasini G, Russo G, Mantarro C, Bini F, Richiusa S, Morgante L, et al. A critical analysis of the robustness of radiomics to variations in segmentation methods in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET images of patients affected by prostate cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13:3640. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Namdar K, Wagner MW, Ertl-Wagner BB, Khalvati F. Open-radiomics: a collection of standardized datasets and a technical protocol for reproducible radiomics machine learning pipelines. BMC Med Imaging. 2025;25:312. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armato SG 3rd, Huisman H, Drukker K, Hadjiiski L, Kirby JS, Petrick N, et al. PROSTATEx challenges for computerized classification of prostate lesions from multiparametric magnetic resonance images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2018;5:044501. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources