Anogenital Contact Dermatitis in Spain: A REIDAC Study of Patients Undergoing Patch Testing in 2019-2024
- PMID: 41365615
- PMCID: PMC12872340
- DOI: 10.1111/cod.70048
Anogenital Contact Dermatitis in Spain: A REIDAC Study of Patients Undergoing Patch Testing in 2019-2024
Abstract
Background: The REIDAC (Spanish Registry for Research in Contact Dermatitis) conducts nationwide epidemiological surveillance of contact dermatitis in Spain. Anogenital involvement within REIDAC has not been previously studied.
Objectives: To describe the most common diagnoses and update relevant allergens in patients with anogenital lesions referred for patch testing.
Methods: We analysed patients who underwent patch testing within REIDAC from 2019 to 2024. Patients were classified into three groups: (G1) exclusively anogenital lesions, (G2) no anogenital involvement and (G3) both anogenital and non-anogenital lesions. Sensitisation and relevance were assessed.
Results: Among 18 291 patients, 116 (0.6%) had exclusively anogenital lesions, 17 576 (96.1%) had no anogenital involvement and 599 (3.3%) had both. G1 patients were more likely to have at least one positive reaction (91.4%), a current relevant reaction (53.4%, diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis, ACD) and to be polysensitised compared to other groups (p < 0.001). 14.5% of anogenital ACD identified cases were not identified by the Spanish baseline series. Fragrances, preservatives, topical anaesthetics and steroids were the leading relevant allergens. Benzisothiazolinone, sodium metabisulfite and propolis emerged as new sensitisers.
Conclusion: ACD was highly prevalent among patients with anogenital lesions referred for patch testing. The threshold for patch testing in these patients may need reconsideration.
Keywords: allergic contact dermatitis; allergy; anogenital; dermatology; environmental medicine; epidemiology; genital diseases.
© 2025 The Author(s). Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Ana María Giménez‐Arnau is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for and/or has received research funding from Almirall, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Avene, Blue‐Print, Celltrion, Celldex, Escient Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, GSK, Harmonic Bio, Incyte, Instituto Carlos III–FEDER, Jaspers, LEO Pharma, Menarini, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Noucor, Novartis, Sanofi‐Regeneron, Septerna, Servier, Thermo Fisher Scientific and Uriach Pharma. Pablo Chicharro has participated in advisory boards, panel discussions and clinical trials organised by the following companies: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Almirall, La Roche‐Posay, Sanofi Genzyme, Lilly, AbbVie, Novartis, LEO Pharma and Pfizer‐Wyeth. Marta Elosua‐González has participated as a researcher and/or speaker and/or consultant for AbbVie, Lilly, Galderma, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, ISDIN, Almirall, Novartis, UCB Pharma and Sanofi Genzyme. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest with this study.
References
-
- Rees S., “Living With Vulval Lichen Sclerosus: Unheard Stories and Silenced Voices,” Case Reports in Women's Health 29 (2021): e00271, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214911220301016. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Martin‐Gorgojo A., Comunión‐Artieda A., Descalzo‐Gallego M. Á., et al., “What Proportion of the Spanish Dermatology Caseload Corresponds to Primarily Sexually Transmitted Infections and Other Anogenital Dermatoses? Results From the DIADERM National Random Survey,” Actas Dermo‐Sifiliográficas 113 (2022): T22–T29, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0001731022000035. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
