Algal assemblage drives patterns in ecosystem structure but not metabolism in a productive river
- PMID: 41366562
- DOI: 10.1002/ecy.70262
Algal assemblage drives patterns in ecosystem structure but not metabolism in a productive river
Abstract
Algal dynamics are fundamental drivers of lotic ecosystem processes. Although rivers tend to be heterotrophic and have low standing stocks of autotrophic biomass, filamentous algae can cause nuisance algal blooms that alter the structure of the autotrophic assemblage. Still, the influence of these blooms on ecosystem processes can be variable. Here, we examined the structural and functional contribution of filamentous and epilithic algae by linking algal biomass measurements to daily primary production fluxes throughout two growing seasons in six sites along the Upper Clark Fork River, an open canopy, snow melt river in western Montana, USA. We partitioned daily productivity estimates across different algal groups using the spatial and temporal variability in algal assemblages across our six sites. By using reach-scale metabolism estimates, we assessed the in situ functional rates of individual algal groups. Throughout two growing seasons, we measured high fluxes of ecosystem productivity and spatially variable filamentous algal blooms. We found that the filamentous algal blooms determined the ecosystem structure in terms of total biomass and algal turnover times, but not the ecosystem functions of gross primary productivity, ecosystem respiration, or net production. Whole-reach estimates of epilithic and filamentous algae growth rates were 0.30 and 0.026 day respectively, which are similar to rates measured in mesocosms. The epilithic algae grew and turned over rapidly, dominating total biomass production and driving ecosystem function while filamentous algae grew slowly and built up large amounts of biomass during a growing season, shaping the structure, but not function, of the ecosystem.
Keywords: algae; aquatic; biomass; carbon; metabolism; productivity.
© 2025 The Ecological Society of America.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aber, J. D., and J. M. Melillo. 2001. Terrestrial Ecosystems, Second ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
-
- Acuña, V., C. Vilches, and A. Giorgi. 2011. “As Productive and Slow as a Stream Can be—The Metabolism of a Pampean Stream.” Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30: 71–83.
-
- Appling, A. P., R. O. Hall, C. B. Yackulic, and M. Arroita. 2018. “Overcoming Equifinality: Leveraging Long Time Series for Stream Metabolism Estimation.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 123: 624–645.
-
- Arroita, M., A. Elosegi, and R. O. Hall. 2019. “Twenty Years of Daily Metabolism Show Riverine Recovery Following Sewage Abatement.” Limnology and Oceanography 64: S77–S92.
-
- Arscott, D. B., W. B. Bowden, and J. C. Finlay. 1998. “Comparison of Epilithic Algal and Bryophyte Metabolism in an Arctic Tundra Stream, Alaska.” Journal of the North American Benthological Society 17: 210–227.