Defining Optimally Safe and Effective Blood Levels of Hydroxychloroquine in Lupus: An Important Step Toward Precision Drug Monitoring
- PMID: 41367131
- DOI: 10.1002/art.70010
Defining Optimally Safe and Effective Blood Levels of Hydroxychloroquine in Lupus: An Important Step Toward Precision Drug Monitoring
Abstract
Objective: Using a hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dose of 5 mg/kg/day in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with a higher risk of flares; HCQ blood level monitoring could be a better way to adjust the HCQ dose. We studied the upper threshold for a reference range of HCQ levels to inform routine monitoring.
Methods: This observational study included patients (N = 2,010) across the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics, Wisconsin, international, and French studies who underwent HCQ blood level measurements. Using adjusted spline and logistic regression analyses on the cross-sectional data, we first identified an HCQ blood level associated with higher HCQ toxicity. Next, we tested if this upper threshold level was supratherapeutic (no further risk reduction for the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 [score ≥6]). Finally, we examined associations between chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage and supratherapeutic (toxic) HCQ blood levels.
Results: Among 1,842 patients (excluding 168 patients with very low HCQ blood levels), 4.9% had HCQ-related toxicity. Odds of toxicity were 2.1-fold higher with blood levels ≥1,150 ng/mL and 1.7-fold higher with the cumulative HCQ dose per 1,000-g increase. Blood levels ≥1,150 ng/mL were associated with a saturation in therapeutic effect, indicating supratherapeutic levels. Patients with CKD stage ≥3 had 2.3-fold higher odds of having supratherapeutic levels (≥1,150 ng/mL).
Conclusion: The therapeutic reference range for HCQ blood level monitoring is 750 to <1,150 ng/mL. HCQ level monitoring could optimize HCQ use, particularly in patients with CKD stage ≥3. Future longitudinal studies are needed to validate the use of HCQ blood level monitoring in optimizing dosing.
© 2025 The Author(s). Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.
References
-
- Ruiz‐Irastorza G, Ramos‐Casals M, Brito‐Zeron P, et al. Clinical efficacy and side effects of antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69(1):20–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.101766
-
- Garg S, Chewning B, Gazeley D, et al. Patient and healthcare team recommended medication adherence strategies for hydroxychloroquine: results of a qualitative study informing intervention development. Lupus Sci Med 2022;9(1):e000720. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-000720
-
- Feldman CH, Collins J, Zhang Z, et al. Dynamic patterns and predictors of hydroxychloroquine nonadherence among Medicaid beneficiaries with systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2018;48(2):205–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.002
-
- Nguyen NV, Svenungsson E, Dominicus A, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in lupus or rheumatoid arthritis pregnancy and risk of major congenital malformations: a population‐based cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2025;64(1):117–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae168
-
- Rovin BH, Ayoub IM, Chan TM, et al. Executive summary of the KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the management of lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 2024;105(1):31–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.09.001
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
