Including people with lived experience in the development of the self-Dehumanisation in Psychosis Scale (DiPS): a reflective account
- PMID: 41369711
- PMCID: PMC12799854
- DOI: 10.1186/s41687-025-00981-3
Including people with lived experience in the development of the self-Dehumanisation in Psychosis Scale (DiPS): a reflective account
Abstract
Background: Lived experience involvement in measure development is recognised as best practice. This article is a reflective account, co-written between researchers and PPIE (Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement) consultants with lived experience of psychosis, about the impact of lived experience involvement in developing the self-Dehumanisation in Psychosis Scale (DiPS). Reporting is guided by the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 - Short Form (GRIPP2-SF).
Methodology: In developing the DiPS, people with lived experience of psychosis contributed both as research participants and as PPIE consultants across multiple stages of development. This included in study document review; identification of domains; item generation, refinement, and amendment; psychometric validation; and dissemination.
Results: Contributions made by people with lived experience were significant across all stages of developing the DiPS, including developing and shaping conceptual understanding of self-dehumanisation; item generation and selection; and improving the comprehensibility and acceptability of the measure.
Discussion: Working collaboratively with people lived experience in measure development can be of benefit both to the validity of the measure, and to those involved. We reflect on the value and importance of working collaboratively, and offer recommendations based on our experiences for researchers co-developing measures.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Development of the DiPS was approved by the University of Bath Psychology Research Ethics Committee (22 157). The DiPS validation study (IRAS ID: 333807) received HRA and Health and Care Research Wales approval by South West – Cornwall & Plymouth Research Ethics Committee (23/SW/0150). Written informed consent to participate was obtained from all research participants. Consent for publication: Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Competing interests: The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
-
- Fricker M (2007) Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
