Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Nov 27;26(23):11526.
doi: 10.3390/ijms262311526.

Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils and Gastric Cancer Risk: Molecular Insights and the Relevance of a One Health Perspective

Affiliations
Review

Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils and Gastric Cancer Risk: Molecular Insights and the Relevance of a One Health Perspective

Claudia Reytor-González et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination in agricultural soils has emerged as a critical environmental and public health issue associated with increased gastric cancer incidence worldwide. Among the most concerning pollutants are cadmium, arsenic, and lead, which persist in the environment and enter the human body primarily through the soil-plant-food chain. This review integrates environmental, molecular, and epidemiological evidence to explain how these metals alter gastric mucosal biology and promote carcinogenesis. Mechanistically, cadmium, arsenic, and lead trigger oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, and epigenetic reprogramming, resulting in genomic instability, resistance to programmed cell death, and the transformation of epithelial cells into invasive phenotypes. These molecular disruptions interact with Helicobacter pylori infection, microbial imbalance, chronic inflammation, and hypoxia-driven remodeling of the gastric stroma, all of which enhance angiogenesis and tumor progression. Advanced experimental platforms, such as gastric organoids, immune co-cultures, and humanized animal models, are improving the understanding of these complex interactions. Adopting a One Health perspective reveals the continuity between environmental contamination, agricultural production, and human disease, underscoring the importance of integrative monitoring systems that combine soil and crop analysis with molecular biomarkers in exposed populations. Strengthening this interdisciplinary approach is essential to design preventive strategies, guide remediation policies, and protect human, animals, and environmental health.

Keywords: One Health; arsenic; cadmium; environmental contamination; gastric cancer; heavy metals; lead.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Influence of Soil pH and Redox Potential on Cadmium, Arsenic, and Lead Speciation, Mobility, and Plant Bioavailability. Acidic soils (low pH) increase Cd mobility and bioavailability, whereas alkaline conditions (high pH) enhance As mobility through arsenate [As(V)] reduction to arsenite [As(III)] under reducing conditions. Lead (Pb2+) remains largely immobile, though its mobility slightly increases in acidic or oxidizing environments. Overall, the bioavailability of these metals to plants is strongly governed by pH and Eh, with acidic soils posing the greatest risk for Cd uptake and anoxic conditions increasing the toxicity of As.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Molecular mechanisms underlying heavy metal-induced tumorigenesis. A crucial factor in their carcinogenic potential is the ability to drive persistent inflammation, which acts as a bridge between exposure and tumor formation. Chronic inflammation enhances DNA damage, fuels cell proliferation, weakens repair systems, and promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), enabling greater invasiveness and metastatic potential. This state is further reinforced by cytokines such as IL−1, IL−6, IL−18, TNF-α, and TGF-β, with IL−1 shifting from its usual protective function to one that facilitates cancer progression under sustained inflammatory conditions [72].

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eskandari O., Amin M.M., Kazemi A., Ghias M., Fatehizadeh A., Zare M.R. Geographical Distribution of Stomach Cancer Related to Heavy Metals in Kurdistan, Iran. Int. J. Environ. Health Eng. 2015;4:12. doi: 10.4103/2277-9183.157700. - DOI
    1. Fei X., Lou Z., Christakos G., Ren Z., Liu Q., Lv X. The Association Between Heavy Metal Soil Pollution and Stomach Cancer: A Case Study in Hangzhou City, China. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2018;40:2481–2490. doi: 10.1007/s10653-018-0113-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. He P., Li X., Zou D., Tang F., Chen H., Li Y. Environmental factors inducing gastric cancer: Insights into risk and prevention strategies. Discov. Oncol. 2025;16:25. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-01771-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao F.-J., Wang P. Arsenic and Cadmium Accumulation in Rice and Mitigation Strategies. Plant Soil. 2020;446:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-04374-6. - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources