Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2026 Jan;25(1):e70318.
doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.70318.

Protein-Flavor Interactions in Plant Protein Food Matrix: Molecular Binding Mechanisms, Influencing Factors, and Modulation Strategies

Xinran Dai  1   2 , Jiaping Zhang  1 , Zhaoshi Chen  1 , Muhammad Awais  3 , Bei Fan  1   4 , Marie-Laure Fauconnier  2 , Liya Liu  1   4 , Fengzhong Wang  1   4
Affiliations
Review

Protein-Flavor Interactions in Plant Protein Food Matrix: Molecular Binding Mechanisms, Influencing Factors, and Modulation Strategies

Xinran Dai et al. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2026 Jan.

Abstract

As plant-based diets gain momentum for health, environmental, and ethical reasons, the demand for plant-based protein foods is accelerating. However, a critical barrier to consumer acceptance lies in their flavor profiles, which are often perceived as off-putting due to complex interactions between plant proteins and flavor compounds. While individual interactions have been explored, an integrated understanding of their mechanisms and modulation remains limited. This review synthesizes current knowledge on plant protein-flavor interactions across molecular, physicochemical, and sensory levels. We examine the structural and functional diversity of plant proteins (legumes, cereals, nuts, seeds, and novel sources), categorize their interaction modes (non-covalent and covalent), and assess the impact of intrinsic (e.g. protein conformation, hydrophobicity) and extrinsic factors (e.g. pH, ionic strength, processing). Analytical models such as Scatchard and Hill equations, alongside QSAR and molecular docking approaches, are discussed. We further explore emerging strategies-physical, chemical, biological, and hybrid-for targeted flavor modulation. It is noted that plant protein-flavor interactions play a dual role: enabling flavor retention and protection, but also triggering off-flavors through irreversible binding or volatile entrapment. These interactions vary across protein types, flavors properties and processing conditions, requiring tailored strategies for optimization. For instance, enzymatic hydrolysis, micro-encapsulation, and data-driven protein engineering (leveraging computational tools to design proteins) offer promising solutions. Future progress hinges on combining sensory physiology with computational modeling and structural bioengineering to develop plant-based foods with improved flavor authenticity, stability, and consumer appeal.

Keywords: Plant‐based protein food; analytical models; flavor modulation; influencing factors; molecular binding; protein‐flavor interactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abeyrathne, E., K. Nam, and D. U. Ahn. 2021. “Analytical Methods for Lipid Oxidation and Antioxidant Capacity in Food Systems.” Antioxidants 10, no. 10: 1587. http://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10101587.
    1. Akkad, R., E. Kharraz, J. Han, J. D. House, and J. M. Curtis. 2019. “Characterisation of the Volatile Flavour Compounds in Low and High Tannin Faba Beans (Vicia faba var. minor) Grown in Alberta, Canada.” Food Research International 120: 285–294. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.02.044.
    1. Arntfield, S. D., E. D. Murray, and M. A. H. Ismond. 1990. “Influence of Salts on the Microstructural and Rheological Properties of Heat‐Induced Protein Networks From Ovalbumin and Vicilin.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 28, no. 6: 1335–1343. http://doi.org/10.1021/jf00096a008.
    1. Bader, S., M. Czerny, P. Eisner, and A. Buettner. 2009. “Characterisation of Odour‐Active Compounds in Lupin Flour.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89, no. 14: 2421–2427. http://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3739.
    1. Bailliere, J., D. Laureys, P. Vermeir, et al. 2022. “10 Unmalted Alternative Cereals and Pseudocereals: A Comparative Analysis of Their Characteristics Relevant to the Brewing Process.” Journal of Cereal Science 106: 103482. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2022.103482.

LinkOut - more resources