Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 26;26(6):1648-1655.
doi: 10.5811/westjem.47312.

Reduced Functional Bed Capacity Due to Inpatient Boarding Is Associated with Increased Rates of Left Without Being Seen in the Emergency Department

Affiliations

Reduced Functional Bed Capacity Due to Inpatient Boarding Is Associated with Increased Rates of Left Without Being Seen in the Emergency Department

Yosef Berlyand et al. West J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluated the relationship between inpatient boarding, measured as functional bed capacity, and left-without-being-seen (LWBS) rates. Functional bed capacity is defined as the mean percentage of ED beds available for new and existing patients over a 24-hour period.

Methods: We performed quantile regression models examining the association between LWBS and terciles (low, medium, and high) of functional bed capacity, as well as median admit-to-departure times, controlling for other daily operational metrics. We additionally performed an encounter-level analysis to assess the relationship between functional bed capacity at the time of a patient's arrival and their likelihood of LWBS. Study sites included one academic, one community, and one pediatric ED in a single, urban medical system.

Results: Our study included 373,388 visits. In the adjusted regression at the daily level, low functional bed capacity was associated with an increase of 1.59% in LWBS compared to high functional bed capacity, which represented a 26.5% relative increase (about three patients) compared to median LWBS of 6.0% (P < .001). Larger daily census (+ 0.07% for each additional patient, P <.001), resulted in two additional patients LWBS for every 15-patient increase in daily census from the median. Additionally, longer length of stay of discharged patients (+ 0.05% for each minute increase, P < .001), resulted in two additional patients LWBS for every 20-minute increase in length of stay from the median. Weekdays relative to weekend days were associated with a 1.28% decrease in LWBS (P < .001) (approximately three fewer patients who left without being seen relative to the median LWBS of 6.0%). At the encounter level, functional bed capacity in the low and middle tercile was significantly associated with an increased probability of a patient LWBS (91% and 40% increases, respectively, P < .001). Of the patients who LWBS, 9.3% were high acuity, 59.5% medium acuity, and 31.2% low acuity.

Conclusion: Functional bed capacity is a new and pragmatic operational metric strongly associated with left-without-being-seen rates and provides an improved way to measure, study, and communicate the impact of inpatient boarding. We propose using functional bed capacity as a metric in future studies of ED operations. Additional studies that incorporate staffing levels to more accurately approximate functional bed capacity and better characterize its true impact on LWBS rates are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Terciles of functional bed capacity by site in a study to determine whether this operational metric is correlated with rates of left without being seen in the emergency department. ED, emergency department; FBC, functional bed capacity.

References

    1. Kelen GD, Wolfe R, D’onofrio G, et al. Emergency department crowding: the canary in the health care system. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv. 2021;2(5)
    1. McCarthy ML, Zeger SL, Ding R, et al. Crowding delays treatment and lengthens emergency department length of stay, even among high-acuity patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(4):492–503e4. - PubMed
    1. Bernstein SL, Aronsky D, Duseja R, et al. The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(1):1–10. - PubMed
    1. Berlyand Y, Copenhaver M, White B, et al. Impact of emergency department crowding on discharged patient experience. West J Emerg Med. 2022;24(2):185–192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. White BA, Biddinger PD, Chang Y, et al. Boarding inpatients in the emergency department increases discharged patient length of stay. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(1):230–235. - PubMed

MeSH terms