Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2026 Feb:195:112606.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112606. Epub 2025 Dec 9.

Usefulness of metal artifact reduction on CT angiography after massive coil embolization in peripheral AVM

Affiliations

Usefulness of metal artifact reduction on CT angiography after massive coil embolization in peripheral AVM

Jihwan Choi et al. Eur J Radiol. 2026 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the image quality of three reconstruction methods-filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (AR50), and deep learning-based reconstruction (DL-M)-processed with the Smart Metal Artifact Reduction (SMAR) technique for post-embolization assessment of peripheral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

Materials and methods: In this prospective single-center study, 30 patients who underwent coil embolization for AVM were included. Post-embolization CT angiography was performed using dual-energy CT. Virtual monoenergetic images at 50 and 70 keV were reconstructed using FBP, AR50, and DL-M. All were processed with SMAR, and DL-M without SMAR served as the baseline. Artifact severity was objectively assessed using the standard deviation (SD) around the AVM, artifact index (AI), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two readers (a resident and a staff radiologist) subjectively graded artifact severity, vessel visualization, and new artifacts using 4-point scales.

Results: At both energy levels, average SD and AI were significantly lower in SMAR-processed images than in baseline DL-M (all p < 0.001). Subjective scores for artifact reduction and visualization of adjacent vessels were also significantly improved (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences among the three SMAR-processed methods. New artifacts appeared in three cases but had minimal effect on interpretability.

Conclusions: SMAR-processed FBP, AR50, and DL-M reconstructions significantly reduced metal artifacts and improved visualization after AVM coil embolization, supporting their value for post-treatment evaluation and clinical decision-making.

Keywords: Arteriovenous malformation; Artifact; Embolization, therapeutic; Image processing, computer-assisted; Tomography, X-ray computed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

LinkOut - more resources