Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2025 Dec;13(12):e70165.
doi: 10.1002/mgg3.70165.

Phenotypic Variability and Paternal Inheritance of a CHD8 Variant Causing Intellectual Developmental Disorder With Autism and Macrocephaly Confirmed by Epigenetic and Structural Analyses

Collaborators, Affiliations
Case Reports

Phenotypic Variability and Paternal Inheritance of a CHD8 Variant Causing Intellectual Developmental Disorder With Autism and Macrocephaly Confirmed by Epigenetic and Structural Analyses

Yutaka Furuta et al. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Intellectual developmental disorder with autism and macrocephaly (IDDAM, OMIM #615032) is an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disorder characterized primarily by intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, macrocephaly, tall stature, gastrointestinal symptoms, and variable neurological manifestations. Most cases result from de novo pathogenic variants in CHD8.

Methods: We conducted genome sequencing through the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) in a female proband harboring a CHD8 variant of uncertain significance (VUS), whose clinical presentation was consistent with IDDAM but included atypical features such as ptosis and hearing loss. Variant pathogenicity was further evaluated using EpiSign DNA methylation analysis and structural biology modeling.

Results: Genome sequencing confirmed the CHD8 variant inherited from her father, who exhibited a subtle feature, including traits consistent with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pathogenicity was confirmed through epigenetic signature testing (EpiSign), demonstrating characteristic methylation patterns and structural biology analysis, predicting significant protein destabilization.

Conclusion: We describe the case of IDDAM caused by a paternally inherited CHD8 variant. Our findings highlight the importance of considering parental inheritance in IDDAM diagnoses and suggest epigenetic and structural biology analyses as valuable tools for reclassifying VUS when variant pathogenicity remains uncertain.

Keywords: CHD8; epigenetics; intellectual developmental disorder with autism and macrocephaly (IDDAM); phenotypic variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Molecular graphics and analyses performed with UCSF ChimeraX, developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco, with support from National Institutes of Health R01‐GM129325 and the Office of Cyber Infrastructure and Computational Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Ptosis before use of pyridostigmine. (B) Improved ptosis after use of pyridostigmine.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
EpiSign (DNA methylation) analysis of peripheral blood from a proband and father with a missense variant in CHD8, the causative gene for IDDAM. (A) Hierarchical clustering and (B) multidimensional scaling plots indicate the proband (red) and father (black) have a DNA methylation profile similar to subjects with a confirmed IDDAM episignature (blue) and distinct from controls (green). (C) MVP score, a multi‐class supervised classification system capable of discerning between multiple episignatures by generating a probability score for each episignature. The elevated score for IDDAM shows an episignature similar to the intellectual developmental disorder with autism and macrocephaly reference cohort.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Structural model of CHD8, Chromodomain‐Helicase‐DNA‐binding protein 8 (residues 801–1350), showing location of the R1178H mutation. Backbone is colored according to 3D colocalization of deleterious variants (Pathprox value most pathogenic, deep red, to least pathogenic, blue). Inset shows the predicted H‐bond network (cyan) stabilizing the tertiary structure of the helicase domain, which would be disrupted by the R>H substitution (Rosetta ddG score > 5 REU). Model is AF‐Q9HCK8‐F1‐v4 from AlphaFold Database.

References

    1. Ab, E. , de Jong R. N., Diercks T., et al. 2006. “Solution Structures of the BRK Domains of the Human Chromo Helicase Domain 7 and 8, Reveals Structural Similarity With GYF Domain Suggesting a Role in Protein Interaction.” Deposited: 2006‐04‐14. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/2CKA.
    1. An, Y. , Zhang L., Liu W., et al. 2020. “De Novo Variants in the Helicase‐C Domain of CHD8 Are Associated With Severe Phenotypes Including Autism, Language Disability and Overgrowth.” Human Genetics 139, no. 4: 499–512. 10.1007/s00439-020-02115-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aref‐Eshghi, E. , Kerkhof J., Pedro V. P., et al. 2020. “Evaluation of DNA Methylation Episignatures for Diagnosis and Phenotype Correlations in 42 Mendelian Neurodevelopmental Disorders.” American Journal of Human Genetics 106, no. 3: 356–370. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.01.019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernier, R. , Golzio C., Xiong B., et al. 2014. “Disruptive CHD8 Mutations Define a Subtype of Autism Early in Development.” Cell 158, no. 2: 263–276. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bienert, S. , Waterhouse A., de Beer T. A., et al. 2017. “The SWISS‐MODEL Repository‐New Features and Functionality.” Nucleic Acids Research 45: D313–D319. 10.1093/nar/gkw1132. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types