Biopsy-proven residual cervical cancer at the end of combined chemoradiation predicts poor outcome-Retrospective single-center cohort study
- PMID: 41423908
- PMCID: PMC12856694
- DOI: 10.1111/aogs.70106
Biopsy-proven residual cervical cancer at the end of combined chemoradiation predicts poor outcome-Retrospective single-center cohort study
Abstract
Introduction: Persistent tumor after combined chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer is an established prognostic factor. Detection may include magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT scan, ultrasound, or biopsies; however, no agreement about the best method and time point has been reached. In our institution, a standardized biopsy protocol of at least four punch biopsies is routinely performed at the last brachytherapy with re-biopsies 6 weeks later in cases not showing histologic complete response (hCR). This study aims to assess the prognostic relevance of these biopsies, especially with respect to the time point of hCR.
Material and methods: This investigation was a retrospective single-center observational cohort study that included all patients treated for locally advanced or node-positive cervical cancer with combined chemoradiation at the University Hospital Innsbruck between 2008 and 2023. Patients with a hCR at the end of radiotherapy were classified as primary negative and otherwise as primary positive. Primary positive patients that achieved complete response at a control biopsy 6 weeks later were classified as secondary negative, and the remaining patients with residual tumor as secondary positive. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between all these groups.
Results: We included 184 patients in this study, from which 46 (25%) were classified as primary positive. These patients experienced a significantly worse PFS compared to primary negative patients (p = 0.008, HR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.20, 3.45]). The difference in PFS was also evidenced when comparing primary negative patients to those who had a hCR 6 weeks after radiotherapy (secondary negative) (p = 0.018, HR = 2.00, 95% CI [1.13, 3.56]). However, in primary positive patients, OS was not significantly reduced (p = 0.29, HR = 1.45, 95% CI [0.73, 2.86]).
Conclusions: Early response evaluation using punch biopsies at the time of the last brachytherapy can identify patients with residual tumor, which exhibit a statistically significant and clinically meaningful risk of disease progression. This risk was not reversed even in the case of a delayed hCR 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiation.
Keywords: biopsy; cervical cancer; chemoradiation; follow‐up; persistence; radiotherapy.
© 2025 The Author(s). Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Conflict of interest statement
Christoph Ebner: Honoraria from AbbVie, travel support, and congress invitations from AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Novartis, GSK, and PharmaMar. Christoph Purtscheller: No conflicts of interest declared. Barin Feroz: Travel support and congress invitations from Roche, Pfizer, Lilly, and Novartis. Jana Rieker: No conflicts of interest declared. Linda Ebner: No conflicts of interest declared. Mara Mantovan: No conflicts of interest declared. Sergej Skvortsov: No conflicts of interest declared. Mario Brüggl: No conflicts of interest declared. Katharina Leitner: Travel support and congress invitations from GSK, MSD, Eisai, and Roche. Verena Wieser: No conflicts of interest declared. Irina Tsibulak: Advisory board participation for AstraZeneca; honoraria from AbbVie, MSD, AstraZeneca, Roche, and PharmaMar; travel support and congress invitations from AstraZeneca, Roche, GSK, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, and PharmaMar. Christian Marth: Funded research from the European Union (EU), Austrian Science Fund (FWF), AstraZeneca, and Roche; honoraria and congress invitations from MSD, AstraZeneca, GSK, Genmab, and AbbVie; consulting and advisory board activities for Roche, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, PharmaMar, BioNTech, GSK, Genmab, and AbbVie. Alain Gustave Zeimet: Funded research from the European Union (EU), Austrian Science Fund (FWF), AstraZeneca, Roche, and PharmaMar; honoraria and congress invitations from Roche, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, AstraZeneca, Eisai Inc., PharmaMar, GSK, Tesaro, Roche Diagnostics, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, and Gilead; consulting and advisory board activities for Roche, Roche Diagnostics, Novartis, Amgen, MSD, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Pfizer, PharmaMar, GSK, Tesaro, Clovis, Biocad, Eisai Inc., AbbVie, Sandoz.
Figures
